| Engine | 3.0L 6-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (S8) |
| Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Diesel |
| Vehicle Class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Trim | Diesel |
| Start-Stop | Yes |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 42691 |
24 MPG combined is a number that won’t shock anyone considering the 2021 Land Rover Range Rover 3.0L 6-cyl. Buyers of this particular vehicle accept this mileage as the cost of admission to a world of unparalleled luxury, commanding presence, and genuine off-road capability. This isn’t a car for those prioritizing lower fuel costs; it’s for those who value a specific blend of British refinement and go-anywhere ability, a blend that demands powerful engine options and a certain disregard for pump prices.
City and highway performance
The EPA estimates the 2021 Range Rover’s 3.0L inline-six will achieve 22 MPG in the city and 28 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the reality of lugging around a vehicle of this size and weight through stop-and-go traffic. The highway number, while an improvement, still acknowledges the Range Rover’s less-than-aerodynamic profile. This isn’t a slippery sedan; it’s a rolling statement, and that statement comes with a slight penalty at higher speeds. The automatic (S8) transmission does its best to keep the engine in its most efficient range, but ultimately, physics play a role.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates that the annual fuel cost for the 2021 Land Rover Range Rover 3.0L 6-cyl is $2,300. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. It provides a standardized benchmark for comparing the Range Rover’s fuel expenses to other vehicles. Keep in mind that premium fuel is recommended, which will likely increase your real-world costs above the EPA estimate.
Real-world expectations
While the EPA provides a useful yardstick, real-world MPG will vary based on driving style, terrain, and load. Range Rover owners who frequently accelerate quickly, navigate hilly landscapes, or regularly haul cargo can expect to see numbers lower than the EPA estimates. Conversely, those who prioritize smooth, consistent driving on flat terrain may achieve figures closer to, or even slightly exceeding, the highway rating. Consider checking ROVER MPG across all years to get a sense of what other owners are experiencing.
How it compares
The Range Rover’s fuel economy places it squarely in line with its direct competitors, but below some rivals taking a different design approach. The BMW X7 xDrive40i, with its inline-six engine, delivers similar combined MPG figures. The Mercedes-Benz GLS 450 isn’t significantly different either, delivering around 23 MPG combined. The Cadillac Escalade, with its larger V8 engine, lands in the low 20s. For those prioritizing efficiency above all else, the Volvo XC90 Recharge plug-in hybrid offers considerably better city and combined MPG figures, but sacrifices some of the Range Rover’s off-road prowess and cachet. If you’re open to considering the entire lineup, explore all Land fuel economy data.
Tips to maximize Efficiency
Gentle acceleration is key. The Range Rover’s responsive engine can be tempting to unleash, but smooth and gradual acceleration will significantly improve fuel consumption. Anticipate traffic flow and avoid unnecessary braking and hard starts.
Pay attention to tire pressure. Maintaining the recommended tire pressure, found on the driver’s side door jamb, reduces rolling resistance and optimizes fuel economy. Regularly check and inflate your tires, especially before long journeys.
Minimize idling. Idling consumes fuel without covering any distance. If you’re stopped for more than a minute or two, turn off the engine. Many modern vehicles, including the Range Rover, feature automatic start-stop systems that do this automatically; ensure this system is enabled.
Avoid using accessories unnecessarily. Features like air conditioning and heated seats place an additional load on the engine, reducing fuel efficiency. Use them carefully, only when necessary.
Consider your route. Whenever possible, choose routes that minimize stop-and-go traffic and avoid steep inclines. A longer, smoother route can often be more fuel-efficient than a shorter, more congested one.