Ford · 2018
Escape FWD FFV 2.5L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Front-Wheel Drive
City
21
MPG
Combined
24
MPG
Highway
29
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$1,800
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$350
saved per year
Class Comparison — Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Bottom 28%
Better than 28 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 24 MPG
This vehicle
24 MPG
Class average
37 MPG
Class lowest
18 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
5
Energy Score
Out of 10
5
GHG Score
Out of 10
369 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine2.5L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)
DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
TrimFFV
Engine DescFFV
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID39465

24 MPG combined isn’t going to win any fuel-sipping contests, but for the 2018 Ford Escape FWD FFV with the 2.5L 4-cylinder engine, it represents a reasonable trade-off. This isn’t a hybrid or a dedicated economy car; it’s a compact SUV designed to be affordable, practical, and relatively comfortable. Buyers of this particular Escape configuration prioritize a low purchase price and ease of use over outright fuel efficiency. They need a reliable daily driver that can handle family duties, light cargo, and occasional road trips without breaking the bank, and they’re willing to accept average fuel economy to achieve that.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates for the 2018 Ford Escape FWD FFV 2.5L are 21 MPG in the city and 29 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the engine’s behavior in stop-and-go traffic, where frequent acceleration and idling take their toll on fuel consumption. The 2.5L engine, while adequate for everyday driving, needs to work harder to get the Escape moving from a standstill. On the highway, the 29 MPG rating demonstrates that the Escape can be reasonably efficient during steady-state cruising, benefitting from the automatic transmission’s ability to select the optimal gear. However, aggressive passing maneuvers or sustained high speeds will noticeably reduce this number. The S6 automatic transmission, while generally smooth, isn’t programmed for aggressive downshifts, which can slightly hamper highway responsiveness and fuel economy during variable speed conditions.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2018 Ford Escape FWD FFV 2.5L at $1,800. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. It’s a useful benchmark, but it’s important to remember that your actual fuel costs will vary depending on your driving habits, the type of fuel you use, and local fuel prices. If you primarily drive in the city or have a lead foot, you can expect to spend more than $1,800 annually. Conversely, if you primarily drive on the highway and practice fuel-efficient driving techniques, you may be able to lower your fuel expenses. Review all Ford fuel economy data to see how vehicles compare.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA estimates provide a standardized baseline, real-world fuel economy often deviates. Owners of the 2018 Ford Escape FWD FFV 2.5L report combined MPG figures that are close to the EPA’s 24 MPG estimate, but achieving that number consistently requires conscious effort. Aggressive acceleration, frequent hard braking, and prolonged idling will all negatively impact fuel economy. Factors like tire pressure, vehicle maintenance, and even weather conditions can also play a role.

It’s realistic to expect a range of 22-26 MPG in mixed driving conditions, with the lower end of that range being more likely for drivers with a heavier foot.

How it compares

Compared to its competitors in 2018, the Ford Escape FWD FFV 2.5L’s fuel economy sits in the middle of the pack. For example, the base model Honda CR-V FWD with its 2.4L engine achieved an EPA-estimated 28 MPG combined, making it a more fuel-efficient choice. The Toyota RAV4 LE FWD with its 2.5L engine also offered slightly better fuel economy, with an EPA estimate of 26 MPG combined. The Nissan Rogue S FWD, with its 2.5L engine and CVT, delivered an impressive 29 MPG combined.

However, the Escape often traded a small fuel economy penalty for a more attractive price point, particularly for budget-conscious buyers who were less concerned with maximizing MPG and more focused on overall value. Exploring ESCAPE MPG across all years can give you more context.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Gentle acceleration is key to maximizing fuel economy in the 2018 Ford Escape 2.5L. Avoid aggressive starts and try to anticipate traffic flow to minimize the need for sudden braking. The engine doesn’t deliver peak power until higher RPMs, so smooth, gradual acceleration will keep it within its most efficient operating range.

Maintain proper tire pressure. Underinflated tires create more rolling resistance, which forces the engine to work harder and consumes more fuel. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate them to the recommended level found on the sticker inside the driver’s side doorjamb. Consider using a digital tire pressure gauge for more accurate readings.

Reduce unnecessary weight. Carrying extra cargo in your Escape adds weight, which reduces fuel economy. Remove any items from your vehicle that you don’t need, such as sports equipment or tools. Even small amounts of weight can add up and affect your MPG over time.

Minimize idling. Idling consumes fuel without moving the vehicle. If you anticipate being stopped for more than a minute, turn off the engine. Modern engines are designed to restart quickly and efficiently, so you won’t be causing any undue wear and tear. This is especially important in city driving, where stoplights and traffic jams are common.

Use cruise control on the highway. Engaging cruise control helps maintain a consistent speed, which can improve fuel economy. Avoid constantly accelerating and decelerating, as this wastes fuel. Cruise control allows the engine to operate more efficiently by maintaining a steady throttle position.