| Engine | 2.7L 6-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Standard Pickup Trucks 2WD |
| Engine Desc | SIDI |
| Start-Stop | Yes |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 38264 |
22 MPG combined isn’t going to set any records, but it’s a respectable figure for the 2017 Ford F150 2WD equipped with the 2.7L EcoBoost V6. This truck isn’t aimed at hypermilers; it’s designed for buyers who need real-world capability without the thirst of a V8. It’s a sweet spot for contractors, weekend warriors, and anyone who occasionally hauls or tows but doesn’t want to pay a fortune at the pump.
City and highway performance
The EPA estimates for the 2017 F150 2WD 2.7L come in at 19 MPG in the city and 26 MPG on the highway. The city figure is where many owners see the most variation, as stop-and-go traffic and frequent acceleration can quickly erode fuel economy. The highway number is more consistent, provided you maintain a steady speed and avoid aggressive driving. The 2.7L EcoBoost, with its turbocharging, can deliver decent efficiency when driven conservatively on the open road.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for this specific F150 configuration at $2,000. This is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using the national average fuel price at the time of calculation. Your actual fuel costs may vary depending on your driving habits, the type of driving you do (city vs. highway), and the prevailing fuel prices in your area. However, the $2,000 figure provides a benchmark for comparing the F150’s fuel costs to other vehicles. If you’re thinking of buying an F150, be sure to do your research and compare F150 MPG across all years.
Real-world expectations
While the EPA estimates provide a useful benchmark, real-world MPG often differs. Many owners report achieving numbers close to the EPA’s estimates, especially on longer trips. However, aggressive driving, frequent short trips, and carrying heavy loads will all negatively impact fuel economy. Consistent maintenance, proper tire inflation, and avoiding unnecessary idling can help you get closer to the EPA’s figures.
How it compares
Compared to other trucks in its class, the 2017 F150 2WD 2.7L performs reasonably well. A similarly equipped 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 with the 4.3L V6 is rated at 18 MPG combined, making the F150 the more efficient choice. The Ram 1500 equipped with the 3.6L V6 achieves a similar 19 MPG combined. However, certain competitor options with smaller engines or hybrid powertrains can achieve slightly better numbers. These comparisons matter to F150 buyers because they’re looking for a balance of capability and affordability, and fuel economy is a key part of that equation. You can also compare all Ford fuel economy data to see how other Ford models fare.
Tips to maximize efficiency
Take advantage of the EcoBoost engine’s turbocharging by driving smoothly and anticipating traffic. Avoid abrupt acceleration and braking, which can significantly reduce fuel economy. The turbo works best when you allow it to gently build power, rather than demanding instant bursts.
Keep your tires properly inflated. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate them to the recommended pressure listed on the sticker inside your driver’s side door. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance and reduce fuel efficiency.
Minimize idling. Idling consumes fuel without getting you anywhere. If you’re going to be stopped for more than a minute, turn off the engine. Modern vehicles are designed to restart quickly and efficiently, so restarting the engine won’t cause significant wear and tear.
Reduce weight and aerodynamic drag. Remove any unnecessary items from your truck bed and cab. A cleaner, more aerodynamic vehicle benefits from better fuel consumption. Consider using a bed cover to improve aerodynamics, particularly on highway trips.
Consider using cruise control on the highway. Maintaining a consistent speed can help you optimize fuel economy. However, be mindful of inclines and declines, as cruise control may not always be the most efficient option in hilly terrain.