| Engine | 1.6L 4-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Small Station Wagons |
| Engine Desc | SIDI |
| Start-Stop | No |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 38344 |
The 2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS AWD gets 26 MPG combined. This number gives you some idea of what to expect from this unusual hatchback, but not the full story. Let’s be honest: fuel efficiency isn’t why people buy this car with its angular styling, it’s the promise of a turbocharged thrill in something that isn’t just another crossover. This isn’t a Prius, it’s a statement.
City and highway performance
Like the Juke itself, the city and highway MPG are very close. The EPA estimates 25 MPG in the city and 29 MPG on the highway, suggesting consistent fuel consumption in different driving conditions. The turbocharger needs to spool up to provide power to all four wheels, and that affects fuel use. While the MPG numbers aren’t terrible, expect lower fuel economy from aggressive driving, even in the city.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS AWD at $2,250. This is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. Fuel prices change, and your driving habits will affect the cost. The annual fuel cost is a benchmark against other vehicles, so owners understand the financial commitment.
Real-world expectations
The EPA provides a standard rating, but real-world fuel economy depends on how and where you drive. If you frequently use the turbocharger or drive in stop-and-go traffic, expect slightly lower numbers than the EPA estimates. Consistent highway driving, with little aggressive passing, might get you closer to, or slightly above, 29 MPG. Drivers who prioritize smooth driving will see better results than those who drive hard.
How it compares
The 2017 Juke Nismo RS AWD doesn’t have direct competitors, but other sporty hatchbacks can be compared. The MINI Cooper S Hardtop 4 Door gets a combined 28 MPG, similar performance with slightly better MPG, but without the Juke’s AWD. The Subaru WRX (with CVT) gets a combined 21 MPG, much less than the Juke, but offers more horsepower and performance. The Mazda3 2.5 gets up to 31 MPG combined, but lacks the Juke Nismo’s style and turbo. These numbers show the trade-offs between performance, style, and MPG. For all all Nissan fuel economy data, the Juke is an unusual alternative. More JUKE MPG across all years can be found on FuelEconomyHub.com.
Tips to maximize efficiency
The Juke’s turbocharger helps and hurts fuel economy. Smooth acceleration and light use of the accelerator will prevent the turbo from engaging as much, keeping fuel consumption down. Avoid flooring the accelerator unless you need the power.
Tire pressure affects fuel efficiency in the Juke Nismo RS. Keep your tires inflated to the manufacturer’s recommended pressure. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, affecting MPG, especially with the Nismo RS’s performance tires.
Weight matters, especially in a car in the subcompact category. Remove unnecessary items from the vehicle to reduce the load on the engine. This is important for daily drivers, as extra weight adds up over time and reduces MPG without you noticing.
Add a fuel additive to clean the fuel injectors. Deposits can build up and reduce their efficiency, affecting fuel atomization. Clean fuel injectors contribute to optimal combustion and better MPG.
Aggressive driving drastically reduces MPG. Anticipate traffic and avoid sudden acceleration and braking, because those burn more gas. Drive calmly to save fuel and money.