Nissan · 2025
Rogue FWD SL/Platinum 1.5L 3-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Front-Wheel Drive
City
29
MPG
Combined
32
MPG
Highway
36
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$1,350
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$800
saved per year
Class Comparison — Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Top 22%
Better than 78 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 32 MPG
This vehicle
32 MPG
Class average
37 MPG
Class lowest
18 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
6
Energy Score
Out of 10
6
GHG Score
Out of 10
278 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
Yes
Start-Stop
Auto stop-start
Vehicle Specifications
Engine1.5L 3-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (AV-S8)
DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Engine DescSIDI
Start-StopYes
EPA Vehicle ID48523

32 MPG combined positions the 2025 Nissan Rogue FWD SL/Platinum 1.5L 3-cyl as a strong contender in the compact SUV segment, a category defined by practicality, value, and increasing demands for efficiency. This shows Nissan’s commitment to delivering a balance of everyday utility and responsible fuel consumption in a vehicle that serves a vast swathe of the American public. The Rogue, especially in its premium SL and Platinum trims, appeals to a buyer who prioritizes comfort, technology, and a hassle-free ownership experience for their daily commutes, school runs, and weekend errands. They aren’t chasing performance, nor are they towing heavy loads; they want a dependable, comfortable crossover with an elevated interior and, crucially, gas station visits they won’t dread. The 1.5L VC-Turbo three-cylinder engine with its automatic (AV-S8) transmission is key to this equation, carefully engineered to provide adequate power delivery while maximizing efficiency.

City and highway performance

The EPA rates the 2025 Nissan Rogue FWD 1.5L at 29 MPG in the city and 36 MPG on the highway. These figures reflect a powertrain tuned for the real-world driving conditions most owners will encounter. The 29 MPG city rating is particularly noteworthy for a compact SUV, where stop-and-go traffic and frequent acceleration cycles typically punish fuel economy. Nissan’s variable compression technology in the 1.5L engine plays a significant role here, adapting the compression ratio on the fly to optimize for either power or efficiency. On the highway, the 36 MPG is excellent, ensuring long road trips are not financially punitive. This powertrain character aligns with the Rogue’s mission: delivering a smooth, unobtrusive driving experience where fuel efficiency is an integrated, rather than demanding, aspect of its operation.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2025 Nissan Rogue FWD SL/Platinum 1.5L 3-cyl to be exactly $1,350. This figure is calculated based on a standardized methodology. The EPA assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year, split between city and highway conditions (55% city, 45% highway), and uses national average fuel prices, which are updated periodically. For the Rogue buyer, this $1,350 annual expenditure represents a tangible financial benefit. It translates to fewer trips to the pump and more money available for other household expenses or discretionary spending. While individual driving habits and local fuel prices will cause this number to fluctuate slightly, the $1,350 provides a consistent, transparent benchmark for comparing running costs.

Real-world expectations

Expect the 2025 Rogue’s 32 MPG combined rating to be largely achievable for most drivers, provided they adopt reasonable driving habits. The VC-Turbo engine rewards a smooth foot more than a heavy one. Aggressive acceleration and sudden braking will, as with any vehicle, decrease efficiency. However, the transmission’s smooth operation and the engine’s broad torque band mean that maintaining efficient momentum does not require excessive effort. For those suburban drivers primarily navigating 35-50 mph zones, the Rogue often performs well, sometimes even exceeding its city rating. Highway cruising at legal speeds will likewise see figures comfortably in the mid-30s.

How it compares

The 2025 Nissan Rogue FWD SL/Platinum 1.5L places itself very competitively against its peers. Consider rivals like the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid LE AWD, rated at 40 MPG combined, or the Honda CR-V Hybrid Sport-L AWD, which achieves 38 MPG combined. These hybrids obviously lead on efficiency, but they also often come with a higher purchase price and, in the CR-V’s case, mandatory AWD, which can deter FWD-preferring buyers. When looking at non-hybrid FWD competitors, the Rogue truly shines. The Mazda CX-5 and CX-50, for instance, typically hover around 28-30 MPG combined in their FWD non-turbo guises. The base Hyundai Tucson FWD with its 2.5L engine manages 28 MPG combined. The Rogue’s 32 MPG combined offers a fuel economy advantage over these direct gasoline-only competitors, making it a strong choice for those who value conventional gasoline power but still demand excellent efficiency without the added complexity or cost of a hybrid system. For drivers interested in exploring all Nissan fuel economy data, or specifically checking out ROGUE MPG across all years, our database provides detailed breakdowns.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Maintain consistent, moderate speeds, especially on the highway. The Rogue’s VC-Turbo engine is designed to optimize for efficiency at steady cruising, so avoiding frequent changes in speed reduces fuel consumption significantly.

Anticipate traffic and feather the throttle rather than applying heavy brake and accelerator inputs. Smooth, gradual acceleration and deceleration help the variable compression engine operate at its most economical settings.

Keep tires properly inflated to the manufacturer’s recommended pressure. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, forcing the engine to work harder and diminishing your overall fuel economy.

Use the Rogue’s Eco mode if available, or simply drive with a lighter foot. This mode often adjusts throttle response and transmission shift points to prioritize fuel efficiency over performance.

Minimize carrying unnecessary weight in the vehicle and consider removing roof racks or cargo carriers when not in use. Added weight and aerodynamic drag both contribute to higher fuel consumption.