Lexus · 2024
RC 350 AWD 3.5L 6-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Premium Gasoline
Subcompact Cars
All-Wheel Drive
City
19
MPG
Combined
22
MPG
Highway
26
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$2,650
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$500
more per year
Class Comparison — Subcompact Cars
Bottom 29%
Better than 29 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 22 MPG
This vehicle
22 MPG
Class average
27 MPG
Class lowest
12 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
5
Energy Score
Out of 10
5
GHG Score
Out of 10
407 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine3.5L 6-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)
DriveAll-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypePremium Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSubcompact Cars
Engine DescSIDI & PFI
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID47320

22 MPG combined isn’t a headline figure, but it accurately reflects the fuel consumption of the Lexus RC 350 AWD. This isn’t a hybrid, nor is it designed to be. It’s a stylish coupe designed for comfortable cruising and the occasional spirited drive, and most buyers accept its thirst for premium fuel as part of its character and all-weather capability.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates 19 MPG in the city and 26 MPG on the highway for the 2024 Lexus RC 350 AWD. The city figure reflects stop-and-go traffic, where the 3.5L V6 and six-speed automatic transmission work harder to repeatedly overcome inertia. The highway figure is more palatable, as the RC 350 AWD settles into a more efficient cruising mode. However, even the highway number probably won’t impress drivers coming from more economy-focused vehicles. The difference is priorities: the RC 350 emphasizes driving experience and design over fuel efficiency.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2024 Lexus RC 350 AWD at $2,650. This is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices for premium gasoline. Individual fuel costs will vary depending on driving habits, local fuel prices, and the proportion of city versus highway driving. This is only an estimate, but it provides a useful benchmark for comparing the RC 350 AWD to other vehicles.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA estimates provide a baseline, real-world fuel economy can vary. Aggressive driving, frequent short trips, and carrying extra weight can all negatively impact efficiency. Careful driving, consistent highway speeds, and proper tire inflation can help owners get close to or even exceed the EPA estimates. Many drivers find their actual MPG slightly below the combined figure, particularly if they frequently drive in congested urban environments. The RC 350’s driver-selectable modes (Eco, Normal, Sport) can influence fuel consumption, but driving style has the biggest impact. For more information, compare RC MPG across all years.

How it compares

The RC 350 AWD’s fuel economy places it in a specific segment. The BMW 430i xDrive coupe achieves a slightly better 28 MPG combined with its turbocharged four-cylinder engine. The Audi A5 coupe, with its quattro all-wheel drive system, manages around 27 MPG combined. These competitors offer a different driving experience. The Infiniti Q60 AWD offers similar performance to the RC 350, but its fuel economy figures are nearly identical. These comparisons show that buyers in this segment often prioritize style, performance, and brand cachet, accepting a certain level of fuel consumption. For details, check all Lexus fuel economy data.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Using the “Eco” drive mode will remap the throttle response and shift points to prioritize fuel efficiency. This mode reduces engine responsiveness, but can produce noticeable gains, especially in city driving. It’s most effective when you don’t need immediate acceleration.

Make sure your tires are properly inflated to the recommended pressure. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which reduces fuel economy. Check your tire pressure regularly, especially during temperature changes.

Avoid aggressive acceleration and braking. Smooth, gradual inputs are more fuel-efficient. Anticipate traffic flow and maintain a consistent speed whenever possible. Minimize hard acceleration, which puts a strain on the engine and consumes more fuel.

Reduce unnecessary weight in the vehicle. Carrying extra cargo increases fuel consumption, especially in stop-and-go traffic. Remove any items you don’t need to lighten the load and improve efficiency.

Consider combining trips to minimize cold starts. Cold starts are less fuel-efficient because the engine has to work harder to reach its operating temperature. Linking multiple errands into a single trip can help overall fuel economy.