The 2024 Acura MDX AWD Type-S 3.0L 6-cyl gets 19 MPG combined. It’s not a fuel-sipping hybrid. The MDX Type-S is a performance-oriented, three-row luxury SUV designed for those who prioritize driving enjoyment and premium features over ultimate efficiency. The MDX Type-S caters to a specific buyer: someone who wants a practical family vehicle but refuses to sacrifice engagement and power, even if it means accepting middling fuel consumption.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates 17 MPG in the city and 21 MPG on the highway for the MDX Type-S. These figures reflect the demands placed on the turbocharged 3.0-liter V6 engine. City driving, with its stop-and-go nature, forces the engine to work harder, dropping efficiency. The highway number is more respectable but still not class-leading. The 10-speed automatic transmission works to keep the engine in its optimal power band, but the MDX’s weight and the engine’s inherent thirst for premium fuel impact the overall numbers.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA calculates the annual fuel cost for the 2024 Acura MDX AWD Type-S at $3,050. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. It’s important to recognize this is an estimate. Your actual costs will vary depending on your driving habits, local fuel prices, and the type of driving you do most often. Drivers who primarily drive in the city or have a heavy foot will likely exceed this annual fuel expenditure.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA provides a benchmark, real-world fuel economy often differs. MDX Type-S owners report numbers slightly below the EPA estimates in mixed driving conditions. Aggressive driving, frequent use of Sport mode, and carrying heavier loads will all decrease fuel efficiency. Careful driving on the highway might yield slightly better results. Expect to be somewhere within the EPA’s range, but closer to the lower end if you regularly enjoy the vehicle’s performance capabilities. The MDX requires premium fuel, adding to the cost of ownership.

How it compares

The MDX Type-S’s fuel economy is competitive within its class. The BMW X5 M50i, with its high-performance V8, achieves a similar 19 MPG combined. An Audi SQ7, another performance-oriented SUV, mirrors this figure. A more fuel-conscious buyer might consider a Lexus RX 350h, which boasts a significantly better 36 MPG combined thanks to its hybrid powertrain. However, the RX prioritizes fuel efficiency over raw power, a key difference for the MDX Type-S demographic. Even Acura’s own MDX with the standard 3.5L V6 engine achieves 22 MPG combined. Comparing MDX MPG across all years highlights the fuel economy tradeoff for the Type-S’s added performance. The comparison isn’t about simply finding the most efficient SUV; it’s about whether the performance upgrade justifies the fuel cost.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Take advantage of the MDX’s drive modes. The “Normal” mode offers a better balance between performance and fuel economy than the “Sport” mode. Selecting “Normal” will reduce throttle sensitivity and shift points, encouraging more efficient driving.

Maintain proper tire inflation. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which consumes more fuel. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate them to the recommended levels listed on the driver’s side doorjamb. This simple step can make a noticeable difference.

Avoid aggressive acceleration and braking. The turbocharged engine responds quickly to throttle inputs, but excessive acceleration wastes fuel. Gradual acceleration and smooth braking conserve energy and improve overall fuel economy. Anticipate traffic flow to minimize unnecessary braking.

Minimize idling. If you anticipate stopping for more than a minute, turn off the engine. Idling consumes fuel without covering any distance. While modern engines are more efficient than older ones at idling, it still contributes to wasted fuel, especially in city driving. Keep up with all Acura fuel economy data to compare models.

Lighten the load. Excess weight in the vehicle puts additional strain on the engine, reducing fuel efficiency. Remove any unnecessary items from the cargo area and passenger compartment. Even small amounts of extra weight can add up, especially over long distances.