21 MPG combined won’t win any hypermiling contests, but for the 2023 Land Rover New Range Rover Sport P400 MHEV, it’s respectable. This isn’t a vehicle designed for penny-pinching commuters; it’s a statement of capability and refined luxury, attracting buyers who prioritize effortless performance and iconic design over fuel efficiency. These buyers demand a vehicle that can conquer challenging terrain, tow a boat, and deliver passengers in quiet comfort, and they’re prepared to accept a trade-off at the pump.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates the Range Rover Sport P400 at 18 MPG in the city and 26 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the stop-and-go reality of urban driving, made worse by the vehicle’s weight and the occasional urge to use the responsive powertrain. The highway number showcases the benefits of the mild-hybrid system and the engine’s efficiency at steady speeds. These figures are just estimates; aggressive driving or consistently heavy loads will reduce them.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA calculates the annual fuel cost for the 2023 Land Rover New Range Rover Sport P400 MHEV at $2,750. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. Individual spending will vary significantly depending on driving habits, local fuel costs, and the percentage of city versus highway miles driven. Still, $2,750 is a useful benchmark for prospective buyers to consider, giving a realistic sense of the financial commitment involved in owning this model.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA provides a standardized benchmark, real-world fuel economy often deviates. Aggressive acceleration, frequent short trips, and extensive idling will all negatively impact fuel consumption. Gentle acceleration, optimized route planning, and consistent highway cruising can bring real-world numbers closer to the EPA estimates.

The Range Rover Sport’s driving dynamics tempt drivers to occasionally indulge in its performance, which can further decrease fuel efficiency. Owners prioritizing low fuel costs should pay close attention to their driving style and route selection.

How it compares

In the realm of luxury performance SUVs, the Range Rover Sport’s fuel economy sits within a competitive range. The BMW X5 xDrive40i, with its similar inline-six engine, boasts a slightly better 23 MPG combined. The Porsche Cayenne, depending on the specific engine configuration, can range from the low teens to the mid-twenties. Even within Land Rover’s lineup, there are trade-offs; view ROVER MPG across all years.

The Range Rover Sport buyer prioritizes a unique blend of luxury, capability, and brand cachet, and they are often willing to accept a slightly lower MPG figure than some competitors in exchange. Prospective buyers should also view all Land fuel economy data before buying.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Use the vehicle’s Eco driving mode. This setting optimizes the powertrain for fuel efficiency by adjusting throttle response, transmission shift points, and other parameters. It may slightly reduce the vehicle’s responsiveness, but it can contribute to noticeable fuel savings, especially in city driving.

Monitor tire pressure regularly. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which directly impacts fuel economy. Check the tire pressure placard on the driver’s side doorjamb for the recommended pressure and maintain it consistently. A tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) will alert you to significant pressure drops, but manual checks are still recommended.

Avoid unnecessary idling. Idling consumes fuel without covering any distance. If you anticipate a prolonged stop, such as waiting for someone or sitting in a parking lot, turn off the engine. The Range Rover Sport’s mild-hybrid system is designed for frequent restarts, minimizing any potential wear and tear on the starter motor.

Plan your routes strategically. Avoid congested areas and prioritize routes with consistent speeds and minimal stops. Using navigation apps with real-time traffic data can help you identify and bypass bottlenecks, reducing fuel consumption and saving time.

Minimize cargo weight. Carrying unnecessary weight requires the engine to work harder, reducing fuel economy. Remove any items from the vehicle that are not essential. Even a small reduction in weight can contribute to incremental fuel savings over time.