Ford · 2020
Transit Connect Wagon LWB FWD 2.5L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD
Front-Wheel Drive
City
20
MPG
Combined
22
MPG
Highway
26
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$2,000
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$150
saved per year
Class Comparison — Special Purpose Vehicle 2WD
Bottom 43%
Better than 43 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 22 MPG
This vehicle
22 MPG
Class average
21 MPG
Class lowest
15 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
4
Energy Score
Out of 10
4
GHG Score
Out of 10
404 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine2.5L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)
DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSpecial Purpose Vehicle 2WD
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID41473

22 MPG combined isn’t going to set the world on fire, but for the 2020 Ford Transit Connect Wagon LWB FWD 2.5L 4-cyl, it’s a reasonable trade-off for its unique combination of passenger space, cargo capacity, and maneuverability. This isn’t a minivan competitor chasing soccer moms; it’s a workhorse disguised as a family vehicle, appealing to small business owners needing a versatile tool or large families prioritizing practicality above all else. These buyers accept the Connect Wagon’s fuel economy because it directly supports their livelihood or specific transportation requirements that other vehicles simply can’t match.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates suggest 20 MPG in the city and 26 MPG on the highway for the 2020 Ford Transit Connect Wagon LWB with the 2.5L engine. The lower city figure reflects the stop-and-go driving and frequent idling inherent in urban environments, something that impacts all vehicles, but particularly those without hybrid assistance. The highway figure, while better, is still influenced by the Transit Connect’s boxy shape and relatively high wind resistance at higher speeds. The six-speed automatic transmission does its best to keep the engine in its optimal powerband, but ultimately, aerodynamics play a significant role in highway fuel consumption. Expect real-world conditions, especially when the van is loaded with passengers or cargo, to often bring highway MPG a bit closer to the combined figure.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2020 Ford Transit Connect Wagon LWB FWD 2.5L 4-cyl at $2,000. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with a hypothetical fuel price reflecting the national average. Of course, your actual fuel expenses will vary depending on your driving habits, the actual price of gasoline in your area, and the proportion of city versus highway miles you accumulate. For those using the Transit Connect for commercial purposes with high mileage, this $2,000 estimate serves as a baseline for projecting yearly operating costs; those figures may rise substantially with greater use and the added toll on components like tires and brakes.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA estimates provide a useful benchmark, real-world fuel economy for the 2020 Ford Transit Connect Wagon can vary significantly depending on several factors. A light foot, coupled with predominantly highway driving, can yield numbers close to or even slightly exceeding the EPA’s 26 MPG highway rating. Conversely, aggressive acceleration, heavy loads, extensive idling, or frequent short trips in cold weather will undoubtedly pull the average downwards. Owners who track their fuel consumption report a wide range of experiences, with some struggling to consistently achieve the EPA combined rating, while others manage to surpass it with careful driving habits. Understanding the vehicle’s limitations and adjusting driving style is key.

How it compares

Compared to alternatives, the 2020 Transit Connect Wagon occupies a unique niche. Full-size minivans like the Chrysler Pacifica (22 MPG combined for the gasoline version, much higher for the hybrid) offer more space and features but are considerably larger and less nimble in urban environments. Compact crossovers like the Honda CR-V (28 MPG combined for FWD models) deliver better fuel economy but can’t match the Transit Connect’s passenger and cargo capacity, especially in the long-wheelbase configuration. Even larger SUVs such as the Ford Explorer (24 MPG combined on the 2.3L EcoBoost engine in FWD configuration) fall short in terms of maximizing interior volume within a relatively small footprint. Those needing to transport seven passengers or shuttle equipment for a small business often find the Transit Connect’s blend of practicality and maneuverability outweighs the fuel economy compromises compared to these alternative vehicles. For those considering other Ford options, you can check all Ford fuel economy data and taking into account the TRANSIT MPG across all years to choose the best version for your needs.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Avoid aggressive acceleration and hard braking. The 2.5L engine responds well to gentle inputs, and anticipating traffic flow allows for smoother deceleration and less wasted kinetic energy. This is even more critical when the van is loaded, as the added weight increases the energy required for both acceleration and braking.

Maintain proper tire inflation. Under-inflated tires increase rolling resistance, which directly impacts fuel economy. Consult the sticker on the driver’s side doorjamb for the recommended tire pressure, and check your tires regularly, especially during seasonal temperature changes.

Reduce unnecessary weight. Carrying around extra cargo adds to the vehicle’s overall weight, forcing the engine to work harder and consume more fuel. Remove any items from the van that are not essential for your daily needs.

Minimize idling. The 2.5L engine consumes a surprising amount of fuel while idling. If you anticipate being stopped for more than a minute or two, turn off the engine. Modern vehicles, including the Transit Connect, are designed to restart quickly and reliably, making this strategy effective for conserving fuel.

Consider using cruise control on the highway. Maintaining a consistent speed with cruise control helps to optimize fuel efficiency, especially on relatively flat stretches of road. However, avoid using cruise control in hilly areas, as the transmission may downshift frequently, negating some of the fuel-saving benefits.