Hyundai · 2019
Kona FWD 1.6L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Front-Wheel Drive
City
28
MPG
Combined
30
MPG
Highway
32
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$1,450
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$700
saved per year
Class Comparison — Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Top 30%
Better than 70 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 30 MPG
This vehicle
30 MPG
Class average
37 MPG
Class lowest
18 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
7
Energy Score
Out of 10
7
GHG Score
Out of 10
303 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine1.6L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (AM7)
DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Engine DescSIDI
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID40271

30 MPG combined is a solid number for the 2019 Hyundai Kona FWD 1.6L 4-cyl, and it’s exactly what a buyer in this segment expects. The Kona isn’t trying to be a hyper-efficient hybrid or groundbreaking EV; it’s a stylish, practical, and affordable subcompact SUV. The 30 MPG figure confirms it delivers everyday usability without breaking the bank at the pump, blending funky design with reasonable running costs.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates for the 2019 Hyundai Kona FWD with the 1.6L turbo are 28 MPG in the city and 32 MPG on the highway. These numbers reflect the engine’s tuning, which favors low-end torque to make it feel peppy around town. The city MPG is particularly relevant for many Kona buyers, who use their vehicles primarily for commuting and running errands in urban environments. The 32 MPG highway rating is sufficient for longer trips, but keep in mind that heavier loads or sustained high speeds will impact that number, especially with this engine’s small displacement. Most buyers will notice that a light foot improves both city and highway numbers, but the 1.6T entices you to drive with gusto. The automatic transmission programming tends to lean toward early upshifts to conserve fuel, but it’s responsive enough when a downshift is needed for passing or merging.

Annual fuel cost

According to the EPA, the estimated annual fuel cost for the 2019 Hyundai Kona FWD 1.6L 4-cyl is $1,450. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. Your actual fuel costs will vary depending on how many miles you drive, your driving habits, and the price of gasoline in your area, particularly because the 1.6T engine is more responsive with premium fuel. The $1,450 figure provides a useful baseline for comparing the Kona’s running costs to other vehicles in its class. Drivers who live in areas with higher gas prices can expect to spend more, while those who drive fewer miles will spend less. For a young professional or a small family on a budget, this figure is reasonable and predictable.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA estimates provide a good starting point, real-world fuel economy can vary depending on individual driving styles and conditions. Some Kona owners report figures close to the EPA estimates, but some drivers experience slightly lower MPG in predominantly city driving or when frequently using the engine’s power. It’s not uncommon to see averages in the mid-to-high 20s in stop-and-go traffic. Conversely, drivers who spend a significant amount of time on the highway and conscientiously practice fuel-efficient driving techniques may see figures closer to, or even slightly exceeding, the 32 MPG highway rating. Overall, the KONA MPG across all years is remarkably consistent, which demonstrates the reliability of the powertrain.

How it compares

The 2019 Hyundai Kona’s fuel economy stacks up competitively against other subcompact SUVs. For example, the Mazda CX-3 FWD offers slightly better gas mileage, hovering around 29 MPG combined. The Honda HR-V FWD achieves approximately 28 MPG combined. Meanwhile, the Nissan Kicks, which focuses on maximizing fuel efficiency, boasts an impressive 31 MPG combined. The all-wheel-drive versions of these vehicles, and others like the Subaru Crosstrek, typically see a 1-3 MPG decrease from the FWD models. The Kona buyer appreciates the added power of the available 1.6L turbo and accepts the marginal fuel economy trade-off relative to base models of competing vehicles for the extra bit of performance. For more Hyundai fuel economy data, visit the EPA’s website.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Monitor your tire pressure regularly. Maintaining the correct tire pressure, as indicated on the sticker inside the driver’s side doorjamb, improves rolling resistance and can positively impact fuel economy. Even a few PSI below the recommended pressure can reduce gas mileage and affect handling, so a quick check every couple of weeks can make a difference.

Avoid aggressive acceleration and hard braking. The Kona’s 1.6L turbo engine responds well to smooth, consistent throttle inputs. By anticipating traffic flow and avoiding sudden bursts of speed, you can significantly reduce fuel consumption, especially in city driving. Practice progressive acceleration to minimize fuel waste.

Use cruise control on the highway whenever possible. Maintaining a constant speed on long highway drives minimizes unnecessary acceleration and deceleration, leading to improved fuel economy. However, use cruise control carefully in hilly areas, as the vehicle may downshift frequently to maintain speed, negating some of the benefits. If you are a flatlander, this tip matters more.

Reduce unnecessary weight. Carrying excessive weight in your vehicle, whether it’s cargo in the trunk or items on the roof rack, increases fuel consumption. Remove any unnecessary items from your Kona to reduce the load on the engine. Even small amounts of extra weight add up over time, diminishing fuel mileage.

Consider using premium fuel, especially if you prioritize performance. While the Kona 1.6T can run on regular gasoline, using premium fuel (as recommended by Hyundai) can optimize engine performance and potentially lead to increased fuel efficiency, particularly under demanding driving conditions. Experiment to see if the benefits justify the higher cost.