33 MPG combined from the 2018 Chevrolet Spark ACTIV 1.4L won’t win any hypermiling trophies, but it’s perfectly acceptable. This car is affordable, city-friendly transportation for those who prioritize low running costs and ease of parking. Consider the Spark ACTIV a more rugged, quasi-SUV version of Chevrolet’s smallest hatchback.

City and highway performance

The EPA rates the 2018 Chevrolet Spark ACTIV at 30 MPG in the city and 37 MPG on the highway. This difference highlights where the Spark excels and where it struggles. The city figure is respectable, reflecting the car’s light weight and the efficiency of its 1.4L four-cylinder engine at lower speeds. The automatic transmission, with its continuously variable gear ratios, contributes to efficient urban driving. Getting up to speed and maintaining it on the highway, however, requires more engine effort, and the smaller engine starts to show its limitations. Expect to see that number drop if you are routinely carrying passengers on the highway. It’s important to consider how you’ll be using the Spark most often.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2018 Chevrolet Spark ACTIV at $1,350. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and assumes the national average fuel price. Individual fuel costs will vary depending on how and where you drive, and the current price of gasoline. However, the $1,350 provides a baseline for comparing the Spark’s running costs to those of other vehicles. It’s one of the reasons why buyers consider a car like the Spark.

Real-world expectations

While official EPA numbers provide a standardized benchmark, your actual fuel economy will vary. Factors like driving style, traffic conditions, and even tire pressure can all influence the MPG you achieve. Aggressive acceleration, frequent hard braking, and prolonged idling will negatively impact fuel consumption. Conversely, smooth acceleration, maintaining a steady speed, and anticipating traffic flow can help you get closer to the EPA estimates, potentially even exceeding them in optimal conditions. Knowing your local area and typical routes will help you anticipate if the fuel economy of the Spark is right for you.

How it compares

In the microcar class, the Spark’s fuel economy is competitive. The Mitsubishi Mirage G4, for example, achieves a slightly higher 37 MPG combined. However, many find the Spark to be a more refined vehicle overall, with a more responsive powertrain and better handling. The Fiat 500, another small car option, gets around 30 MPG combined in its base trim. For a buyer primarily focused on very low fuel costs and seeking all Chevrolet fuel economy data, the Mirage may hold a slight edge. But for those prioritizing a more enjoyable driving experience and a more modern interior along with acceptable economy, the Spark ACTIV is a strong option. Across all trims and years, a look at SPARK MPG across all years can show changing trends.

Tips to maximize efficiency

The Spark benefits from a light touch. Avoid sudden acceleration and hard braking. Anticipate traffic lights and coast whenever safe, allowing the car to slow down gradually. The lighter you are on the accelerator, the more you will appreciate the fuel economy the Spark can deliver.

Ensure your tires are properly inflated to the recommended pressure. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which reduces fuel economy. Check your tire pressure regularly, especially during seasonal temperature changes, as pressure can fluctuate. A simple tire pressure gauge can save you money.

Minimize idling. If you’re stopped for more than a minute, turn off the engine. Modern engines are designed to restart quickly and efficiently, and even a short period of idling can waste a surprising amount of fuel, especially in stop-and-go traffic. This is ideal for urban environments.

Consider the weight you’re carrying. The Spark is a small car, and even modest amounts of extra weight can noticeably affect its fuel economy. Remove unnecessary items from the trunk and passenger compartment. Less weight equals less effort for the engine, translating directly into better MPG.