Mitsubishi · 2017
Lancer 4WD 2.4L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Compact Cars
All-Wheel Drive
City
23
MPG
Combined
26
MPG
Highway
30
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$1,700
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$450
saved per year
Class Comparison — Compact Cars
Bottom 41%
Better than 41 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 26 MPG
This vehicle
26 MPG
Class average
33 MPG
Class lowest
12 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
6
Energy Score
Out of 10
6
GHG Score
Out of 10
343 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine2.4L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (AV-S6)
DriveAll-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassCompact Cars
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID38147

The 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer 4WD with the 2.4L engine gets 26 MPG combined. A compact sedan equipped with a capable all-wheel-drive system, a feature important for those facing snowy climates and variable road conditions, that’s not going to win any awards for less gas, but it’s what you get. This isn’t a vehicle for the hypermiler; it’s for the pragmatic buyer who values winter traction and reliability over segment-leading fuel efficiency.

City and highway performance

The 2017 Lancer 4WD’s fuel economy breaks down to 23 MPG in the city and 30 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the increased demands placed on the 2.4L engine and automatic transmission (AV-S6) in stop-and-go traffic. The all-wheel-drive system, while offering superior grip, also adds weight and driveline friction, further impacting urban fuel consumption. On the open road, the Lancer fares better, approaching the 30 MPG mark. Drivers can expect to see this number on longer trips, provided they maintain consistent speeds and avoid aggressive acceleration.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer 4WD 2.4L at $1,700. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and assumes national average fuel prices. It provides a standardized benchmark for comparing running costs with other vehicles, but individual expenses will vary depending on driving habits and local fuel prices. Drivers who primarily travel short distances in the city, or those with a heavy foot, can expect to exceed this annual estimate.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA figures offer a guide, real-world fuel economy is influenced by numerous factors. A driver’s style plays a significant role; frequent hard acceleration and braking will negatively impact fuel efficiency. Terrain matters as well, hilly or mountainous roads demand more engine power, increasing fuel consumption. Tire pressure, vehicle maintenance, and even weather conditions can also affect MPG. A realistic expectation for most Lancer 4WD 2.4L drivers is to see figures within a couple of MPG of the EPA estimates, depending on their specific circumstances.

How it compares

The 2017 Lancer 4WD’s fuel economy isn’t class-leading. Consider the 2017 Subaru Impreza, another compact sedan with standard all-wheel drive. The Impreza, with its 2.0L engine and CVT, boasts a combined EPA rating of 31 MPG. The 2017 Honda Civic, offering a more efficient 1.5L turbo engine in certain trims, achieves up to 42 MPG on the highway, although it lacks the Lancer’s all-wheel-drive capability. These comparisons highlight the Lancer’s compromise between all-weather traction and fuel efficiency. For those who prioritize MPG above all else, there are more economical choices. However, if all-wheel drive is a necessity, the Lancer presents a more affordable option than some SUVs and trucks. Explore all Mitsubishi fuel economy data to see how the Lancer stacks up against other models in the brand’s lineup. You can also investigate LANCER MPG across all years.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Maintain proper tire inflation. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, forcing the engine to work harder and consume more fuel. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate to the manufacturer’s recommended levels, found on the sticker inside the driver’s side door.

Avoid unnecessary idling. If you anticipate being stopped for more than a minute, turn off the engine. Modern engines are designed to restart quickly and efficiently, and prolonged idling wastes fuel.

Drive smoothly and anticipate traffic flow. Avoid aggressive acceleration and hard braking. Maintaining a steady speed and anticipating traffic patterns allows the automatic transmission to operate more efficiently.

Reduce unnecessary weight. Carrying extra cargo in the trunk or on the roof rack increases the vehicle’s weight, requiring more fuel to move it, so remove any items you don’t need for your daily driving.

Consider using a lighter-weight wheel and tire package. A reduction in rotational mass can have a positive impact on MPGs, even slightly, as long as you maintain appropriate safety standards and load ratings. If this vehicle is equipped with the factory alloy wheels, going to an aftermarket set can sometimes net you a benefit, especially if they are a smaller diameter.