16 MPG combined isn’t going to win any fuel efficiency awards, but for the specific application of the 2017 Lincoln MKT Hearse AWD with the 3.5L V6, it’s far from the primary concern. The MKT Hearse isn’t purchased for grocery runs or daily commutes. It’s a specialized vehicle, often custom-built for a single, solemn purpose, and its fuel economy is considered within that unique context.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates 14 MPG in the city and 19 MPG on the highway for this configuration of the MKT Hearse. The city figure reflects the stop-and-go nature of urban driving, which heavily impacts fuel consumption. Hearses are often used in processions, navigating urban streets at low speeds.

The 19 MPG highway estimate reflects more consistent driving conditions, which might be seen on longer transfers between funeral homes or cemeteries outside of city centers. These numbers are based on standard testing procedures and can vary based on driving style, traffic conditions, and vehicle maintenance.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates an annual fuel cost of $2,750 for the 2017 Lincoln MKT Hearse AWD 3.5L 6-cyl. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. Given the specialized nature of this vehicle, the mileage may vary significantly. Some funeral homes might accumulate far fewer than 15,000 miles annually, while others serving larger or more rural areas might exceed that figure. Therefore, this $2,750 estimate should be viewed as a general guideline rather than a precise prediction of actual fuel expenses.

Real-world expectations

Real-world fuel economy for the MKT Hearse likely deviates from the EPA estimates, especially when considering its usual operating conditions. Hearses often spend extended periods idling, which significantly reduces fuel economy.

The additional weight of the coachwork and vehicle accoutrements compared to a standard MKT also plays a factor in the fuel usage. The professional drivers of these vehicles might prioritize smoothness and a respectful pace over aggressive acceleration and braking, which can positively influence fuel consumption. Ultimately, funeral homes should track their own fuel usage to understand their specific operating costs.

How it compares

The fuel economy of a hearse isn’t typically a primary deciding factor against other considerations like build quality, passenger comfort, and customization options. Still, comparisons can be made. A similarly sized Cadillac hearse built on the XTS platform, with its 3.6L V6, offered similar fuel economy ratings in the mid-teens. Newer Lincoln Navigator-based hearses, while offering more space and updated technology, tend to deliver slightly lower MPG numbers due to their increased size and weight. Owners considering other options can always reference all Lincoln fuel economy data, or narrow their options to MKT MPG across all years to make the best decision for their business.

Tips to maximize efficiency

While fuel economy might not be important, optimizing it can still reduce operating costs. Ensure the MKT Hearse undergoes regular maintenance, including oil changes, tire rotations, and air filter replacements. A well-maintained engine and properly inflated tires can contribute to slightly improved fuel efficiency.

Minimize idling time whenever possible. While idling is sometimes unavoidable in processions or during services, reducing unnecessary idling can save a noticeable amount of fuel over time. Consider equipping the hearse with a remote start system so it can be warmed or cooled efficiently before use, further reducing overall engine idling time.

Drive smoothly and avoid harsh acceleration or braking. The MKT Hearse is not a performance vehicle; gentle acceleration and anticipating traffic conditions can significantly improve fuel economy. This driving behavior also aligns with the respectful nature of the vehicle’s purpose.

Carefully plan routes to minimize stop-and-go traffic. Hearses frequently travel to specific locations, so optimizing routes to avoid congested areas and minimizing the number of stops can help conserve fuel. Consider the time of day and typical traffic patterns along frequently traveled routes.