The 2017 Ford Escape FWD 1.5L gets 26 MPG combined, which isn’t going to win any hypermiling contests, but it’s a reasonable choice for buyers who want affordability, practicality, and a slightly more engaging driving experience than some competitors that get better gas mileage. This Escape isn’t trying to be a Prius; it’s aiming for the heart of the budget-conscious crossover segment, where versatility and value often outweigh outright fuel efficiency.

City and highway performance

The 2017 Ford Escape with the front-wheel-drive 1.5L EcoBoost engine is rated at 23 MPG in the city and 30 MPG on the highway. The city figure is adequate, reflecting stop-and-go traffic where the small turbo engine is frequently used to provide a surge of power. The highway number is more respectable, showing the Escape can maintain decent efficiency on longer journeys when the engine is running at a more consistent load. The six-speed automatic transmission plays an important role here, offering smooth shifts and helping to keep the engine in its optimal rev range for fuel conservation. Remember that these numbers are based on standardized testing; your actual mileage will depend on driving style, load, and terrain.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2017 Ford Escape FWD 1.5L at $1,700. This assumes 15,000 miles of driving per year, with an equal mix of city and highway conditions, using the national average fuel price at the time of the EPA’s testing. This figure offers a useful benchmark for comparing running costs between different vehicles. If you drive significantly more or less than 15,000 miles annually, or if fuel prices in your area are higher or lower than the national average, your actual fuel expenses will vary accordingly. Still, $1,700 offers a clear way to see what you can expect to pay at the pump. To further explore all Ford fuel economy data, you can find more relevant comparisons.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA numbers provide a valuable baseline, the true measure of fuel efficiency is what drivers experience. Many Escape owners can achieve the EPA’s 26 MPG combined figure if they drive efficiently. However, aggressive acceleration, frequent short trips, and carrying heavy loads will decrease fuel economy. The 1.5L EcoBoost engine is responsive, but it can become thirsty if pushed hard. If most of your driving is concentrated within the city with frequent congestion, expect numbers closer to the low 20s. On longer highway drives, exceeding 30 MPG is achievable with some care.

How it compares

In the crowded compact SUV segment, the 2017 Ford Escape’s fuel economy is about average. The Toyota RAV4 LE, for example, achieves an EPA-rated 26 MPG combined in its non-hybrid FWD trim, matching the Escape. The Honda CR-V LX, another strong choice, also boasts around 28 MPG combined. The Nissan Rogue S, sometimes marketed for its fuel efficiency, comes in higher at a combined 29 MPG. However, some competitors, particularly those with larger, more powerful engines, fall considerably short. The Mazda CX-5 with its 2.5L engine comes close with 27 combined MPG. For Escape shoppers, the CR-V’s slight edge might be tempting, though many buyers will find the Escape’s sportier driving dynamics and available technology more appealing. Those prioritizing high fuel efficiency would likely lean towards the RAV4 Hybrid or other electrified options, but the Escape’s value and overall features still appeal to a broad audience. You will also want to compare the available ESCAPE MPG across all years.

Tips to maximize efficiency

The 1.5L EcoBoost engine in the 2017 Escape benefits from smooth and consistent acceleration. Avoid abrupt starts and stops, and try to anticipate traffic flow to maintain a steady speed. This reduces the need for sudden bursts of power, which can significantly decrease fuel economy, especially with the smaller engine having to work harder.

Regular maintenance is critical for optimal fuel efficiency. Ensure that your tires are properly inflated, as underinflated tires increase rolling resistance and reduce MPG. Also, keep up with scheduled oil changes and air filter replacements, as these factors directly impact engine performance and efficiency.

Minimize unnecessary weight in the vehicle. Carrying heavy loads, whether it’s cargo in the trunk or passengers, increases the engine’s workload and decreases fuel economy. Remove any items you don’t need to minimize the overall weight. Also, consider removing roof racks when not in use, as they disrupt airflow and negatively affect aerodynamics.

Use cruise control on long highway drives whenever possible. Maintaining a consistent speed, especially on level terrain, helps to optimize fuel consumption. However, be mindful of using cruise control in hilly areas, as the transmission may downshift frequently, negating some of the fuel-saving benefits.