| Engine | 2.5L 4-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S7) |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Midsize Station Wagons |
| Trim | Hybrid |
| Start-Stop | Yes |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 37269 |
27 MPG combined isn’t going to wow anyone looking for top-tier fuel economy, but inside the 2016 Nissan Murano Hybrid AWD, it’s a carefully considered balance. This isn’t a Prius competitor designed for ultimate efficiency; instead, it’s a stylish, comfortable crossover for buyers who want to use less gas without giving up the Murano’s fundamental appeal. These are typically professionals, empty nesters, or small families who value design, a premium feel, and available all-wheel drive over pure fuel economy. They know that a non-hybrid Murano gets considerably worse mileage and are happy to pay extra for the hybrid’s efficiency gains.
City and highway performance
The EPA numbers provide details on the Murano Hybrid’s performance in different conditions. 26 MPG in the city is particularly important for urban and suburban drivers, who are its target market. Stop-and-go traffic is where the hybrid powertrain’s electric motor works best, supplementing the 2.5L 4-cylinder engine and recapturing energy when braking. The Murano Hybrid gets 29 MPG on the highway. While not drastically higher than the city rating, it shows it can maintain decent efficiency on longer trips. These numbers are respectable, reflecting a modern hybrid drivetrain.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Nissan Murano Hybrid AWD at $1,600. This is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices when tested. Actual fuel costs will vary based on driving habits, fuel type, and local gas prices, but this gives potential buyers a realistic idea. Considering this cost, along with the purchase price and overall running expenses, creates a complete financial picture.
Real-world expectations
The EPA provides a standardized test, but real-world driving is often different. Drivers in hilly areas or those who accelerate hard might see slightly lower MPG. On the other hand, drivers who accelerate smoothly and brake regeneratively might see numbers close to, or even better than, the EPA estimates. Tire pressure, outside temperature, and accessory use like air conditioning can also affect fuel consumption in daily driving.
How it compares
To understand the Murano Hybrid’s fuel economy, compare it to its competition. The standard, non-hybrid Murano, with a V6 engine, gets around 21 MPG combined, showing the hybrid’s fuel-saving benefit. A direct rival is the Lexus RX 450h, which gets 31 MPG combined, and offers better fuel economy, but costs more. The Toyota Venza, a two-row crossover with available all-wheel-drive, gets an EPA estimated 39 combined MPG. Buyers choose the Murano Hybrid because it values its own styling and driving feel more than pure fuel efficiency. For a broader view, see all Nissan fuel economy data. Check the MURANO MPG across all years to see how its efficiency has changed.
Tips to maximize efficiency
The Murano Hybrid’s regenerative braking is important for efficient driving. Predict stops and release the accelerator early to capture as much energy as possible, instead of braking hard at the last second. This improves fuel economy and extends brake pad life.
Correct tire inflation, shown on the sticker inside the driver’s side door, helps fuel efficiency. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, making the engine work harder. Check tire pressure regularly, especially when temperatures change.
Avoid hard acceleration and keep a consistent speed. The hybrid system works best when driven steadily, letting the electric motor assist the engine effectively. Gentle throttle inputs are key to higher MPG.
Reduce use of accessories like air conditioning and heated seats, because they put more load on the engine. Use them carefully, particularly on short trips. Open windows for ventilation if possible, rather than turning on the air conditioning immediately.
Think about your route and avoid traffic if possible. Stop-and-go traffic reduces fuel economy. Choose routes that allow more consistent speeds, even if slightly longer, to improve efficiency.