| Engine | 3.8L 6-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (AM6) |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Subcompact Cars |
| Start-Stop | No |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 36052 |
19 MPG combined is the reality for the 2016 Nissan GT-R. Nobody buys a GT-R expecting Prius-like efficiency, and Nissan never designed it to be a green machine. This car is about raw, blistering performance, accessible speed that just happens to be street legal. The fuel economy is the price you pay to experience that exhilaration.
City and highway performance
The GT-R’s official EPA fuel economy numbers are 16 MPG in the city and 22 MPG on the highway. The city number reflects the stop-and-go nature of urban driving, and the GT-R consumes more gas when repeatedly accelerating its weight from a standstill. The highway figure, while still not stellar, is more indicative of relaxed cruising, though the temptation to the twin-turbo V6’s power is ever-present. Expect to see that 22 MPG figure plummet when you accelerate to overtake.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates an annual fuel cost of $3,050 for the 2016 Nissan GT-R. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, using a blend of city and highway driving, and assumes current national average fuel prices. Your actual fuel costs may vary depending on your driving habits, the type of fuel you use (premium is mandatory), and local fuel prices. Drivers who frequently engage in spirited driving or track days, or who live in areas with high fuel costs can expect to exceed this estimate.
Real-world expectations
Real-world GT-R fuel economy is almost universally worse than the EPA numbers, especially if you drive it as intended. Most owners report averages closer to 14-17 MPG in mixed driving. Aggressive acceleration, frequent use of launch control, and extended periods under boost will hurt your fuel economy. Gentle drivers who spend most of their time on the highway might approach the EPA numbers, but they’re missing the point of owning a GT-R. It’s a machine built for performance, and that comes at a cost.
How it compares
The GT-R’s fuel economy is predictably lackluster compared to its rivals. The Porsche 911 Turbo, for example, achieves 19 MPG city and 24 MPG highway in its 2016 iteration. The 2016 Audi R8 V10 Plus manages a similar 13/22 MPG. Even the BMW M6 Gran Coupe achieves 15 MPG city and 22 MPG highway. These differences do not deter the GT-R buyer, as they seek a distinct driving experience using technology at an attainable price. Potential owners should be aware of all Nissan fuel economy data, and consider that the low figures are offset by the capabilities offered by this vehicle. For information on GT R MPG across all years, visit the Fuel Economy Hub.
Tips to maximize efficiency
The GT-R is not a fuel-sipping machine, but owners can employ a few techniques to get slightly better mileage. Avoid aggressive launches and heavy acceleration, the twin-turbo V6 burns fuel when pushed hard. Smooth throttle inputs will make a difference, especially in city driving.
Use the GT-R’s “Normal” driving mode when cruising or commuting. This setting softens throttle response and optimizes the transmission for fuel efficiency. It dulls the driving experience compared to “R” mode, and it can help save fuel.
Maintain proper tire inflation. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which impacts fuel economy and handling. Check your tire pressures regularly and inflate them to the levels on the doorjamb sticker. The fuel economy will suffer once you get aftermarket wheel and tire combinations.
Service your GT-R according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Regular oil changes, air filter replacements, and spark plug maintenance will ensure the engine runs optimally and efficiently. Neglecting scheduled maintenance can lead to decreased performance and reduced fuel economy.
Consider the weight that you have in the car. Removing unneeded items will help lower the vehicle weight and help with better gas mileage. The GT-R is a heavy car, so adding more weight will worsen the fuel economy.