With 29 MPG combined, the 2016 Mazda CX-5 2WD with the 2.0L 4-cylinder engine is a thrifty choice in the compact SUV segment. This number appeals to buyers who prioritize practicality and lower running costs, people who appreciate Mazda’s emphasis on driving dynamics but also need the versatility of a small SUV. This CX-5 configuration balances a fun-to-drive experience with reasonable gas mileage.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates show 26 MPG in the city and 34 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the stop-and-go nature of urban driving, where the CX-5’s naturally aspirated engine performs adequately. While engines with turbos might offer quicker acceleration, the 2.0L’s linear power delivery and responsive throttle offer a smooth and predictable experience. The 34 MPG highway rating is particularly appealing for those who frequently embark on longer journeys. This figure demonstrates the engine’s efficiency at sustained speeds, making it a comfortable and economical choice for road trips. The smooth-shifting six-speed manual transmission helps drivers keep the engine in its sweet spot, maximizing fuel sipping on the open road.

Annual fuel cost

According to the EPA, the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Mazda CX-5 2WD 2.0L is estimated at $1,500. This calculation is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with a fuel price that reflects the national average at the time of testing. Your actual fuel costs will vary depending on your individual driving habits, the type of driving you do (city vs. highway), and the fluctuating price of gasoline in your region. The $1,500 estimation provides a useful benchmark for comparing the CX-5’s running costs against competitors, giving a complete ownership picture.

Real-world expectations

The EPA figures provide a standardized comparison, but real-world MPG can differ. Driving style, weather conditions, tire pressure, and even the terrain you typically drive on can all influence fuel economy. Owners who prioritize maximizing efficiency through gentle acceleration, consistent speeds, and diligent maintenance are more likely to achieve figures closer to the EPA estimates. Aggressive driving, frequent short trips, and neglecting basic maintenance will lead to lower MPG. Pushing the 2.0L hard will require it to use more fuel, due to its relatively small size. It’s best to drive this configuration smoothly and efficiently.

How it compares

The 2016 CX-5 2WD 2.0L offers good fuel economy compared to its rivals. The 2016 Honda CR-V LX 2WD achieves nearly identical EPA ratings, around 26 MPG city and 33 MPG highway. The 2016 Toyota RAV4 LE 2WD achieves about 24 MPG city and 31 MPG highway. Because some drivers find the Mazda more engaging to drive than either the Honda or Toyota, these numbers make the Mazda very competitive. Checking CX 5 MPG across all years can help a buyer see if Mazda keeps offering thrifty CX-5 variants. This comparison is important for buyers on a firm budget, where every mile-per-gallon counts. The CX-5 2.0L offers excellent fuel efficiency and the practicality of a compact SUV. See all Mazda fuel economy data for more information.

Tips to maximize efficiency

The keys to maximizing fuel economy are smooth and deliberate driving habits because this CX-5 has a naturally aspirated engine and manual transmission. Avoid aggressive acceleration and hard braking because these actions place greater demands on the engine and reduce efficiency. Instead, focus on maintaining a consistent speed and anticipating traffic flow to minimize the need for sudden stops and starts.

Proper tire inflation plays a significant role in fuel economy. Check your tires regularly and ensure they are inflated to the recommended pressure listed on the driver’s side doorjamb. Under-inflated tires create more rolling resistance, which forces the engine to work harder and consume more fuel. Maintaining optimal tire pressure not only improves fuel economy but also enhances tire life and overall safety.

Reduce unnecessary weight inside the vehicle. The lighter the vehicle, the less energy it takes to move it. Remove any items from the trunk or cargo area that are not essential, as extra weight can negatively impact fuel economy, especially in city driving. This is especially true for the 2.0L, which needs to work harder when loaded down.

Minimize the use of air conditioning, especially during shorter trips. The AC compressor puts an extra load on the engine, which reduces fuel economy. When possible, use the fresh air ventilation system or roll down the windows to stay cool. On the highway, air conditioning can be more efficient than driving with the windows open because the resulting aerodynamic drag also reduces fuel efficiency.