33 MPG combined won’t set any records, but it’s a respectable figure for the 2016 Mazda 3 5-Door with the 2.0L 4-cylinder engine. This isn’t a stripped-down economy car; it’s a fun-to-drive, stylish hatchback that appeals to buyers who prioritize driving dynamics and design over outright fuel savings. Consider it the enthusiast’s choice in a segment often dominated by bland appliances, and the MPG makes perfect sense.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates for the 2016 Mazda 3 5-Door 2.0L place city driving at 29 MPG and highway driving at 39 MPG. The spread between these figures suggests this car is well-suited for a mix of driving conditions. The 29 MPG city figure is particularly noteworthy; many competitors struggle to reach that level in urban environments. The highway number speaks to the engine’s efficiency at cruising speeds, making it a comfortable and economical choice for longer trips. The 6-speed automatic transmission contributes to both of these figures, offering smooth shifts and optimized gear ratios for both acceleration and fuel conservation.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates that the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Mazda 3 5-Door 2.0L is $1,350 per year. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. It’s a standardized calculation that allows buyers to compare the fuel costs of different vehicles. Keep in mind that your actual fuel costs will vary based on your driving habits, the type of fuel you use, and local fuel prices.

Real-world expectations

The EPA figures provide a good baseline, but real-world MPG often differs. Owners of the 2016 Mazda 3 5-Door 2.0L frequently report figures that are close to the EPA estimates, Mazda’s engineering and the car’s inherent efficiency make it happen. However, aggressive driving, frequent short trips, and carrying heavy loads can all negatively impact fuel economy. If you employ efficient driving techniques and keep the car properly maintained, you can achieve or even exceed the EPA estimates. Factors that affect MPG can be researched on 3 MPG across all years.

How it compares

In the compact hatchback segment, the 2016 Mazda 3 stands out from vehicles with all Mazda fuel economy data. The Honda Civic Hatchback (2017 model year), for example, achieves around 34 MPG combined in its base LX trim, a slight edge over the Mazda. The Toyota Corolla iM (later renamed Corolla Hatchback) averages around 31 MPG combined, making the Mazda a more efficient option.

Even hybrid alternatives like the Toyota Prius offer superior fuel economy (around 52 MPG combined), but come with a different driving experience and a higher price point. The Mazda’s blend of efficiency and driving pleasure is what sets it apart; buyers accept a slightly lower MPG than some competitors in exchange for a more engaging driving experience.

Tips to maximize efficiency

The Mazda 3’s Skyactiv engine is designed for efficiency, but you can still play a role in maximizing your MPG. Avoid aggressive acceleration and braking. Gentle and gradual inputs will allow the engine and transmission to operate in their most efficient ranges.

Regular maintenance is key. Keep your tires properly inflated, as low tire pressure increases rolling resistance and reduces fuel economy. Ensure that your engine air filter is clean because a dirty filter restricts airflow and reduces engine efficiency.

Minimize unnecessary weight. Remove any items from your car that you don’t need, as extra weight requires more energy to move. This is especially true for heavy items in the cargo area.

Use cruise control on the highway. Maintaining a consistent speed helps to optimize fuel economy, especially on long drives. Just be mindful of traffic conditions and adjust your speed as needed.

Consider using the “Sport” mode sparingly. While it enhances throttle response and makes the car more fun to drive, it also consumes more fuel. Save it for those occasions when you really want to enjoy the car’s performance capabilities.