Land Rover · 2016
Range Rover LWB 3.0L 6-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Premium Gasoline
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
4-Wheel Drive
City
17
MPG
Combined
19
MPG
Highway
23
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$3,050
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$900
more per year
Class Comparison — Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Bottom 42%
Better than 42 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 19 MPG
This vehicle
19 MPG
Class average
27 MPG
Class lowest
11 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
4
Energy Score
Out of 10
4
GHG Score
Out of 10
468 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
Yes
Start-Stop
Auto stop-start
Vehicle Specifications
Engine3.0L 6-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S8)
Drive4-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypePremium Gasoline
Vehicle ClassStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Engine DescSIDI
Start-StopYes
EPA Vehicle ID36631

The 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Long Wheelbase (LWB) with the 3.0L supercharged V6 gets 19 MPG combined. Gas mileage isn’t the main concern for buyers of this model. They care more about space, road presence, reliable off-road capability, and the Range Rover’s reputation. They want luxury and aren’t too worried about frequent trips to the gas station.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates the 2016 Range Rover LWB 3.0L at 17 MPG in the city and 23 MPG on the highway. The city figure is due to urban stop-and-go driving, where the Range Rover’s weight and inertia affect fuel consumption. The highway number is still lower than many competitors. This is because the vehicle prioritizes interior space and classic Range Rover design over aerodynamics. The supercharged engine provides plenty of power and quick acceleration, but that performance requires fuel.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover LWB 3.0L at $3,050. This is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with a mix of city and highway driving, using the national average fuel price. Your actual fuel costs will change depending on your driving habits, location, and local gasoline prices.

Real-world expectations

Range Rover owners know that getting the EPA’s combined 19 MPG can be hard. Expect numbers closer to the city estimate, or even lower, in real-world driving, especially with aggressive driving or frequent off-roading. Towing, which this vehicle can do, will significantly decrease fuel economy. While not made for fuel efficiency, gentle acceleration and highway driving can help you reach the EPA highway figure. Consult ROVER MPG across all years for model-specific fuel economy details.

How it compares

Compared to its rivals, the 2016 Range Rover LWB 3.0L’s fuel economy is about average, but rarely the best. For example, the Mercedes-Benz GLS 450 usually gets slightly better combined mpg in real-world conditions, even though it is not particularly fuel efficient. A similarly configured BMW X7 xDrive40i often performs better than the Range Rover, but it has a different driving experience and less off-road capability. The Cadillac Escalade, another large luxury SUV, often has similar or slightly worse MPG, depending on the engine, but it attracts a different buyer. If fuel economy is a top priority, there are other SUVs in this class with better numbers; however, those alternatives don’t have the Range Rover’s distinctiveness and off-road history. See all Land fuel economy data.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Gentle acceleration significantly improves fuel consumption. Avoid quick starts and hard stops. Anticipate traffic and keep a steady speed. The supercharger increases the air entering the engine, so aggressive throttle uses more fuel to match. A smoother driving style prevents the supercharger from working too hard.

Make sure your tires are inflated to the recommended pressure. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which makes the engine work harder and use more fuel. Check your tire pressure often, particularly when the temperature changes, as pressure fluctuates.

Use the Range Rover’s “Eco” driving mode when it is appropriate. This typically changes throttle response and shift points to prioritize fuel efficiency over performance. It might not dramatically raise your MPG, but it can give you small gains over time.

Think about the weight you’re carrying. Taking out unnecessary cargo can lighten the load on the engine and improve fuel economy. A lighter vehicle needs less energy to accelerate and maintain speed.