The 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0L gets 24 MPG combined. While not exceptional, it’s an acceptable trade-off for buyers who prioritize style and image over fuel efficiency. Evoque buyers aren’t typically cross-shopping with Prius owners. They’re drawn to the vehicle’s distinctive design, brand reputation, and all-weather capability, and accept middling fuel economy as part of the package.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates the 2016 Range Rover Evoque at 21 MPG in the city and 29 MPG on the highway. These figures reflect the performance of the 2.0L turbocharged four-cylinder engine and nine-speed automatic transmission. City driving, with its stop-and-go traffic, tends to make the engine use more fuel as the turbo engages repeatedly. The highway figure is better, as the Evoque settles into a more efficient cruising speed. However, aerodynamic limitations affect fuel use at higher speeds. Expect to achieve numbers close to these ratings during mixed driving.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA calculates the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque at $2,400. This is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. Fuel prices change, and your actual costs may vary depending on your driving and the price of gasoline in your area. Premium fuel is recommended, which can increase your expenses past the official EPA figure. See ROVER MPG across all years.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA provides a standardized estimate, real-world fuel economy often differs. The Evoque’s turbocharged engine benefits from a light foot on the accelerator, but its weight and all-wheel-drive system reduce efficiency. Drivers who spend most of their time in urban environments are likely to see figures closer to the 21 MPG city rating, while those with longer commutes or frequent highway trips may approach the 29 MPG highway rating. Aggressive driving, short trips, and using features like air conditioning all negatively impact fuel economy. As with any vehicle, your mileage may vary. View all Land fuel economy data too.

How it compares

The 2016 Evoque’s fuel economy is average for its class. The Acura RDX, with its standard V6 engine, achieves around 22 MPG combined. The BMW X1, with its turbocharged four-cylinder, does slightly better, at around 25 MPG combined. The Lexus NX 300h hybrid offers impressive fuel economy, surpassing 30 MPG. But these alternatives lack the Evoque’s bold styling.

Buyers who are more concerned about fuel costs may want to consider the Lexus or BMW, but those drawn to the Range Rover’s distinctive design are often willing to accept slightly less gas mileage. Fuel economy numbers of competing diesel models may sound appealing, but maintenance costs must be factored in, partially offsetting any savings.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Maintain proper tire inflation. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which forces the engine to work harder and reduces fuel efficiency. Regularly check your tire pressure and inflate them to the manufacturer’s recommended levels, found on a sticker on the driver’s side doorjamb.

Avoid aggressive driving habits. Rapid acceleration and hard braking consume more fuel. Gradually accelerate and maintain a steady speed whenever possible. Anticipate traffic flow and avoid unnecessary braking by looking ahead and coasting to slow down.

Reduce unnecessary weight. Carrying excessive cargo in your Evoque reduces its fuel efficiency. Remove any items that you don’t need, such as sporting equipment, tools, or other unnecessary items, from the cargo area to reduce the vehicle’s weight.

Minimize idling. Idling consumes fuel without covering any distance. If you anticipate being stopped for more than a minute or two, turn off the engine. Modern vehicles start quickly and easily, so restarting the engine is more efficient than letting it idle.

Use cruise control on the highway. Cruise control helps maintain a consistent speed, which improves fuel efficiency on long highway drives. Avoid abrupt acceleration and deceleration while using cruise control, as this can negate its benefits.