| Engine | 6.2L 8-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic 8-spd |
| Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Engine Desc | SIDI |
| Start-Stop | No |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 36701 |
17 MPG combined is the price of admission for piloting the 2016 GMC Yukon K1500 XL 4WD with the strong 6.2L V8. This isn’t a vehicle purchased for hypermiling; it’s selected for its large interior, serious towing capacity, and confident presence. Buyers in this segment prioritize space, durability, and power, and are willing to accept the fuel consumption that comes with it.
City and highway performance
The EPA estimates of 14 MPG in the city and 20 MPG on the highway realistically reflect the driving conditions where this Yukon XL is least efficient and most efficient, respectively. Stop-and-go traffic extracts a heavy toll on any large SUV, made worse by the 6.2L V8’s displacement. Highway cruising, however, allows the engine to settle into its sweet spot, using the 8-speed automatic transmission to maintain reasonable efficiency. The 20 MPG figure is achievable for those who prioritize steady speeds and minimize aggressive acceleration or deceleration.
Annual fuel cost
According to the EPA, the estimated annual fuel cost for the 2016 GMC Yukon K1500 XL 4WD 6.2L 8-cyl is $2,600. This figure is calculated based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with a blend of city and highway driving, using the national average fuel prices at the time of calculation. It represents a benchmark for owners to gauge their personal fuel expenses against. Keep in mind that your actual fuel costs may vary depending on local fuel prices, driving habits, and the percentage of city versus highway miles driven.
Real-world expectations
While the EPA figures provide a standardized baseline, real-world fuel economy results will vary. Drivers who frequently tow trailers, navigate steep inclines, or engage in aggressive driving habits will likely see lower average MPG figures than the EPA estimates. Conversely, those who primarily drive on the highway, maintain consistent speeds, and practice smooth acceleration may find their fuel economy closer to or even slightly above the 20 MPG highway rating. Consider this YUKON MPG across all years when factoring in the cost of ownership of this vehicle.
How it compares
The 2016 Yukon XL 6.2L’s fuel economy is generally in line with other full-size, four-wheel-drive SUVs equipped with powerful V8 engines. The comparable Ford Expedition with its 3.5L EcoBoost V6 manages around 19 MPG combined, offering a slightly more efficient alternative, though it may not deliver the same raw power feel. A Chevrolet Suburban with the 5.3L V8 is rated at 18 MPG combined, making it a close competitor in terms of fuel consumption. These comparisons are important for buyers weighing the balance between fuel costs and capability. For those considering other options, view all Gmc fuel economy data.
Tips to maximize efficiency
Reduce unnecessary weight inside the vehicle. The less weight the engine has to haul, the better the fuel economy. Remove any items in the cargo area or passenger seats that you don’t need on a regular basis. This simple action can make a noticeable difference when repeated over all trips.
Monitor your driving habits. Avoid aggressive acceleration and braking, which wastes fuel. Instead, accelerate smoothly and maintain a steady speed. Anticipate traffic flow to minimize braking and coast whenever possible, allowing the vehicle’s momentum to contribute to efficiency.
Ensure tires are properly inflated. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, leading to decreased fuel economy. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate them to the recommended pressure indicated on the tire placard located on the driver’s side doorjamb.
Consider using cruise control on long highway drives. Cruise control helps maintain a constant speed, avoiding surges in acceleration that can negatively impact fuel economy. However, be mindful of using cruise control in hilly terrain, as it may downshift aggressively to maintain speed, reducing efficiency.