Cadillac · 2016
CTS Sedan 2.0L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Premium Gasoline
Midsize Cars
Rear-Wheel Drive
City
21
MPG
Combined
25
MPG
Highway
30
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$2,300
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$150
more per year
Class Comparison — Midsize Cars
Bottom 35%
Better than 35 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 25 MPG
This vehicle
25 MPG
Class average
35 MPG
Class lowest
13 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
6
Energy Score
Out of 10
6
GHG Score
Out of 10
360 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine2.0L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S8)
DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypePremium Gasoline
Vehicle ClassMidsize Cars
Engine DescSIDI
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID36746

The 2016 Cadillac CTS 2.0T gets 25 MPG combined. It’s not going to win any fuel-economy awards, but for a stylish, rear-wheel-drive luxury sedan offering performance and comfort, it’s a trade-off many buyers accept. This CTS isn’t about squeezing every last mile from a gallon of gas; it’s about providing a good driving experience with enough efficiency to keep running costs reasonable.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates that the 2016 Cadillac CTS 2.0T will achieve 21 MPG in the city and 30 MPG on the highway. These figures are important for understanding the vehicle’s strengths and weaknesses. The 21 MPG city rating reflects the stop-and-go nature of urban driving, where the engine has to work harder to accelerate from a standstill. The 30 MPG highway rating showcases the engine’s ability to cruise efficiently at steady speeds. This difference highlights that the CTS 2.0T favors longer trips on the open road, making it a suitable choice for those who frequently commute or take road trips.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates an annual fuel cost of $2,300 for the 2016 Cadillac CTS 2.0T. This calculation is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using the national average fuel price. Remember that this is only an estimate. Your actual fuel costs will vary depending on your driving habits, the type of fuel grade you use, and local fuel prices. However, the $2,300 figure provides a benchmark for comparing the CTS 2.0T’s running costs against other vehicles in its class. Keeping an eye on fuel prices in your area and adjusting your driving style can help minimize this expense.

Real-world expectations

EPA estimates provide a standardized benchmark, but real-world fuel economy can vary significantly. Aggressive driving, heavy traffic, and even weather conditions can impact the numbers you see on your dashboard. Owners reporting their experiences on fuel tracking sites often find their figures hovering slightly below the EPA combined rating. However, conservative driving and prioritizing highway miles can often yield gas mileage numbers equal to or even a tad better than the 30 MPG rating. Consider the EPA values a good starting point, but factor in your own driving patterns to get a more realistic picture of what you’ll actually spend at the pump. Be sure to consult CTS MPG across all years.

How it compares

In the competitive luxury sedan segment, the 2016 Cadillac CTS 2.0T’s fuel economy is competitive, but not class-leading. The BMW 328i (2016 variant) with its 2.0L turbocharged engine manages a similar 26 MPG combined. The Mercedes-Benz C300 (2016 edition), also equipped with a 2.0L turbo, achieves around 25 MPG combined. Where the CTS might lose out slightly in ultimate MPG numbers, it often compensates with a more aggressive design and a focus on driving dynamics that resonates with certain buyers. For example, someone cross-shopping a Lexus ES 350 (rated at 24 MPG combined) might find the CTS’s sharper handling and rear-wheel-drive bias more appealing, even if the Lexus offers slightly better fuel efficiency. Consider visiting all Cadillac fuel economy data.

Tips to maximize efficiency

The 2.0L turbocharged engine in the CTS responds well to smooth and deliberate acceleration. Avoid jerky starts and hard braking, as these habits significantly deplete fuel efficiency. Instead, focus on maintaining a consistent speed and anticipating traffic flow to minimize unnecessary acceleration.

Proper tire inflation is critical. Check your tires regularly and ensure they are inflated to the recommended pressure listed on the driver’s side doorjamb. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, reducing fuel economy. A simple pressure check can make a surprising difference.

Excess weight in the vehicle can hurt fuel efficiency, especially in the city. Remove any unnecessary items from the trunk and passenger compartment. Every extra pound forces the engine to work harder, consuming more fuel.

Use the car’s “Tour” driving mode for everyday commuting. This mode optimizes the engine and transmission settings for fuel efficiency without sacrificing too much performance. Save the “Sport” mode for when you truly want to enjoy the car’s handling and responsiveness.