Land Rover · 2015
Range Rover L FFV 5.0L 8-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Premium Gasoline
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
4-Wheel Drive
City
14
MPG
Combined
16
MPG
Highway
19
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$3,600
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$1,450
more per year
Class Comparison — Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Bottom 11%
Better than 11 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 16 MPG
This vehicle
16 MPG
Class average
27 MPG
Class lowest
11 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
3
Energy Score
Out of 10
3
GHG Score
Out of 10
570 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
Yes
Start-Stop
Auto stop-start
Vehicle Specifications
Engine5.0L 8-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S8)
Drive4-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypePremium Gasoline
Vehicle ClassStandard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
TrimFFV
Engine DescSIDI; FFV
Start-StopYes
EPA Vehicle ID35761

16 MPG combined won’t win any hypermiling awards, but the 2015 Land Rover Range Rover L FFV 5.0L 8-cyl isn’t about sipping fuel. It’s about effortless power, unparalleled off-road capability, and a luxurious experience that few SUVs can match. This is a vehicle bought by those who prioritize presence and prestige over pump prices, individuals for whom capability and comfort outweigh the frequent fill-ups.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates the Range Rover Long Wheelbase with the supercharged V8 at 14 MPG in the city and 19 MPG on the highway. Those numbers reflect the realities of a heavy, full-time four-wheel-drive vehicle powered by a potent but thirsty engine. Stop-and-go traffic is the enemy, as the Rover’s considerable weight demands significant energy to get moving. Highway cruising is slightly better, but even then, the aerodynamic profile of a brick means wind resistance plays an important role.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2015 Land Rover Range Rover L FFV 5.0L 8-cyl at exactly $3,600. This calculation is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with roughly 55% of those miles driven in the city and 45% on the highway. The calculation also assumes national average fuel prices. Your actual fuel costs will vary depending on your driving habits and where you live, but $3,600 is a realistic benchmark using a standardized formula.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA provides a standardized estimate, real-world fuel economy often deviates. Aggressive driving, frequent short trips, and prolonged idling will all negatively impact MPG. The supercharged V8 is incredibly responsive, and its intoxicating exhaust note can tempt drivers to use its full potential often, sacrificing efficiency. Careful driving and minimizing unnecessary weight in the vehicle can help you get closer to the EPA estimates. Terrain also matters; climbing hills consumes far more fuel than driving on flat surfaces. Drivers interested in seeing all Land fuel economy data may find it helpful to compare models.

How it compares

The Range Rover’s fuel economy lags behind some of its competitors. For example, the Cadillac Escalade, even with its 6.2L V8, manages an EPA-estimated 17 MPG combined. The Mercedes-Benz GLS 550, while also thirsty, can achieve around 16 MPG combined. Even the BMW X7 M50i, with its potent V8, is rated at 18 MPG combined. The differences might seem small, but they add up over time. However, those vehicles don’t offer the same level of off-road capability or the cachet of the Range Rover, which explains why buyers are willing to overlook the Rover’s lower numbers. Comparing ROVER MPG across all years can be helpful.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Avoid aggressive acceleration and braking. The Range Rover’s supercharged engine responds eagerly to throttle inputs, but a gentle foot will significantly improve fuel economy. Anticipate traffic flow and maintain a steady speed whenever possible.

Ensure your tires are properly inflated. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, forcing the engine to work harder and consume more fuel. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate them to the recommended levels found on the driver’s side doorjamb.

Reduce unnecessary weight. Carrying extra cargo adds to the vehicle’s overall weight, which decreases fuel economy. Remove any items you don’t need from the cargo area and passenger cabin.

While tempting, avoid using the “Dynamic” driving mode unless you truly need the extra responsiveness. The standard “Comfort” mode provides a good balance of performance and fuel economy, while “Eco” mode prioritizes efficiency even further, adjusting throttle response and shift points.

Consider the hybrid variants of the Range Rover if fuel economy is a major concern. While they don’t offer the same raw power as the supercharged V8, they provide a significant improvement in MPG, especially in city driving.