| Engine | 3.0L 6-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Midsize Cars |
| Engine Desc | SIDI |
| Start-Stop | No |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 37627 |
20 MPG combined isn’t going to win any fuel efficiency awards, but for the 2017 Lincoln MKZ with the 3.0L twin-turbo V6 and all-wheel drive, it’s arguably acceptable. This MKZ isn’t bought for hypermiling; it’s for comfortable cruising, effortless passing power, and confident all-weather grip, a package that caters to buyers who prioritize a smooth and refined driving experience over outright fuel savings.
City and highway performance
The EPA estimates suggest 17 MPG in the city and 26 MPG on the highway for this configuration. The somewhat thirsty city rating reflects the engine’s willingness to provide instant power, tempting drivers to dip into the throttle more frequently. The highway figure is more respectable, highlighting the engine’s ability to settle into a relaxed cruise, using the six-speed automatic transmission’s overdrive gears to minimize fuel consumption. However, aggressive acceleration and higher speeds will certainly drag that 26 MPG figure down.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates that the annual fuel cost for the 2017 Lincoln MKZ AWD with the 3.0L V6 will be approximately $2,200. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with 55% of those miles driven in the city and 45% on the highway, using the national average fuel price. Remember that your own fuel costs might fluctuate based on changing gasoline prices and your individual driving habits and patterns.
Real-world expectations
While the EPA’s estimates provide a baseline, real-world MPG often varies. Drivers who frequently engage the MKZ’s sport mode or live in hilly or mountainous areas will likely see figures below the EPA averages. Similarly, consistent short trips where the engine doesn’t reach optimal operating temperature will also negatively impact fuel economy. On the other hand, drivers who prioritize smooth acceleration and steady highway speeds can approach or even slightly exceed the EPA’s 26 MPG highway estimate. Owner forums suggest some drivers are seeing averages closer to 22-23 MPG in mixed driving, showing that the official numbers are achievable with conscious effort.
How it compares
In the field of mid-size luxury sedans with all-wheel drive and powerful engines, the 2017 MKZ’s fuel economy isn’t exceptional, but it’s not disastrously low either. Consider the BMW 340i xDrive from the same year, which achieves around 25 MPG combined. The Acura TLX SH-AWD with the V6 lands around 24 MPG combined. Then there’s the Lexus IS 350 AWD, which mirrors the MKZ’s combined figure of 20 MPG. The MKZ’s figures are therefore in the same performance ballpark, although there are slightly more frugal options available. For someone prioritizing the Lincoln’s quiet, comfortable ride and distinctive styling over maximizing MPG, this difference might be a worthwhile compromise. Explore MKZ MPG across all years to understand how efficiency has evolved over the model’s lifespan. See all Lincoln fuel economy data to get the full picture of their lineup.
Tips to maximize efficiency
The 3.0L V6 in the MKZ is responsive, and it becomes tempting to exercise its ample power. Avoid aggressive acceleration. Gradual and smooth throttle inputs will keep the turbos from spooling unnecessarily, reducing fuel consumption.
Monitor tire pressure regularly. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, forcing the engine to work harder and consume more fuel. Check your tires at least once a month and ensure they are inflated to the manufacturer’s recommended pressure.
Minimize idling time. If you’re waiting for someone or stopped for longer than a minute, it’s generally more efficient to turn off the engine. Modern engines are designed to restart quickly and efficiently, so idling wastes fuel without significantly benefiting the car.
Plan your trips strategically. Combine errands into a single journey to minimize cold starts, which are less fuel-efficient than a warm engine. Avoiding peak traffic hours can also reduce stop-and-go driving, which is bad for fuel economy.