23 MPG combined isn’t going to win any awards for lower fuel costs, but it’s a respectable figure for the 2016 Mazda CX-9 4WD. This vehicle is a practical, seven-passenger SUV with all-weather capability and a surprising dose of driving enjoyment. Buyers accept this fuel economy because they prioritize space, safety, and a bit of style over outright thriftiness. They’re willing to trade a few MPGs for the CX-9’s sharp handling and distinctive design.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates for the 2016 Mazda CX-9 4WD are 21 MPG in the city and 26 MPG on the highway. These figures reflect the tuning of Mazda’s 2.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine and six-speed automatic transmission. The city estimate suggests the CX-9 will be reasonably efficient in stop-and-go traffic, and the highway number demonstrates respectable long-distance cruising ability. Front-wheel drive trims can offer slightly better economy figures, but the 4WD version sacrifices very little mileage for added security in bad weather.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA calculates the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Mazda CX-9 4WD at $1,900. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. It’s a useful benchmark for comparing the CX-9’s running costs against other SUVs in its class. Understanding how this number is calculated also allows buyers to adjust the estimate based on their own driving habits and local fuel prices. Remember that aggressive driving, extended idling, and using premium fuel (which isn’t required) will all increase this cost.

Real-world expectations

EPA estimates provide a standardized comparison, but real-world fuel economy can vary significantly. The 2016 Mazda CX-9 is driven primarily by families, meaning it often carries passengers and cargo. These extra loads, along with driving style and terrain, will influence MPG. Drivers who prioritize smooth acceleration and anticipate traffic flow are more likely to achieve figures closer to the EPA estimates. Those who frequently engage the CX-9’s sporty side may find their fuel economy dips notably. Keep an eye on the CX 9 MPG across all years to get a sense of the model’s efficiency across its lifespan.

How it compares

The 2016 Mazda CX-9 4WD stacks up competitively against other SUVs. A 2016 Honda Pilot 4WD, for example, achieves an EPA-estimated 22 MPG combined, slightly behind the CX-9. The 2016 Toyota Highlander 4WD V6 manages 20 MPG combined, showcasing the CX-9’s advantage in fuel economy with the turbo four. Even a smaller SUV like the 2016 Nissan Murano AWD posts only 24 MPG combined, demonstrating that size doesn’t always dictate fuel efficiency. This comparison matters to buyers because it highlights the CX-9’s effective balance of practicality and fuel economy, especially alongside other vehicles that offer similar passenger and cargo space.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Smooth acceleration is key. The CX-9’s turbocharger delivers plenty of low-end torque, so there’s no need to aggressively mash the accelerator pedal. Gentle acceleration not only saves fuel, but also contributes to a more relaxed and enjoyable driving experience.

Minimize idling time. Modern engines are most efficient when running at operating temperature. Letting the CX-9 idle for extended periods, especially in cold weather, wastes fuel and contributes to unnecessary emissions. If you’re going to be stopped for more than a minute or two, turn off the engine.

Maintain proper tire pressure. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, forcing the engine to work harder and reducing fuel economy. Regularly check your tire pressure and inflate them to the recommended levels, typically found on a sticker inside the driver’s side doorjamb or in the owner’s manual.

Reduce aerodynamic drag. The CX-9’s sleek design helps with aerodynamics, but adding roof racks or cargo carriers can negatively impact fuel economy, especially at highway speeds. Remove these accessories when they’re not needed to minimize drag and improve efficiency.

Consider the front-wheel drive (FWD) version if all-wheel drive isn’t essential. While the 4WD CX-9 is capable in adverse conditions, it does carry a small fuel economy penalty compared to the FWD model. If you live in a region with relatively mild winters, the FWD version might be a better choice. You can explore all Mazda fuel economy data and compare models directly to make the most informed decision.