Lincoln · 2016
MKZ FWD 2.0L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Midsize Cars
Front-Wheel Drive
City
22
MPG
Combined
26
MPG
Highway
33
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$1,700
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$450
saved per year
Class Comparison — Midsize Cars
Bottom 42%
Better than 42 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 26 MPG
This vehicle
26 MPG
Class average
35 MPG
Class lowest
13 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
6
Energy Score
Out of 10
6
GHG Score
Out of 10
341 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine2.0L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)
DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassMidsize Cars
Engine DescSIDI
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID36163

26 MPG combined is respectable, but not groundbreaking, for the 2016 Lincoln MKZ with the 2.0L turbocharged four-cylinder engine and front-wheel drive. It reflects a deliberate choice: this isn’t a hybrid designed for maximum fuel sipping, but a comfortably appointed near-luxury sedan aimed at buyers who value a smooth ride and a quiet cabin over outright efficiency. These are drivers who appreciate elegant styling and user-friendly technology, and fuel economy is a consideration weighed against other priorities.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates for the 2016 MKZ 2.0L FWD are 22 MPG in the city and 33 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the engine needing to work harder during stop-and-go driving, something common in urban environments. The highway number, however, shows the engine’s potential when cruising at consistent speeds. The six-speed automatic transmission helps here, finding the optimal gear for efficiency. However, aggressive acceleration will quickly drop those highway numbers into the mid-20s.

Annual fuel cost

According to EPA estimates, the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Lincoln MKZ 2.0L FWD is approximately $1,700. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. Keep in mind that this is an estimate. The actual cost will depend on your driving habits, the type of fuel you use (although premium is only recommended, not required), and of course, fluctuations in gas prices. However, the $1,700 figure is a useful benchmark for budgeting and comparing the MKZ’s running costs to other vehicles.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA figures provide a good baseline, real-world fuel economy often varies. Factors like driving style, traffic conditions, and even tire pressure can influence how many miles you get per gallon. Many drivers report achieving numbers close to the EPA estimates with gentle driving. Drivers with heavier feet, frequent short trips, or who mainly drive in the city report slightly lower figures. Understanding these variables is key to setting realistic fuel economy expectations.

How it compares

The 2016 MKZ 2.0L FWD competes in a crowded segment. The Acura TLX with its 2.4L four-cylinder engine achieves a similar 28 MPG combined. The Lexus ES 350, while offering a more powerful V6, returns around 24 MPG combined. Even the turbocharged variants of the Buick Regal hover around 25 MPG combined. These numbers matter to the MKZ buyer because they highlight the trade-offs. The MKZ prioritizes luxury and comfort, and its fuel economy is comparable to other non-hybrid options in its class. If maximum fuel efficiency is the primary goal, the MKZ Hybrid, or models like the Lexus ES 300h (around 40 MPG combined), would be more appropriate choices. You can review MKZ MPG across all years to see how this model compares.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Gentle acceleration is crucial with the 2.0L turbo. Avoid aggressive starts and try to maintain a steady speed. The turbocharger responds quickly to throttle input, but using it sparingly will translate directly into less gas used.

Monitor your tire pressure regularly. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which forces the engine to work harder and reduces fuel economy. Check the sticker on the driver’s side doorjamb for the recommended pressure, and use a reliable gauge.

Minimize idling. Modern engines don’t need to warm up for extended periods. If you anticipate being stopped for more than a minute, turn off the engine. Restarting consumes far less fuel than idling.

Combine trips when possible. Short trips are particularly inefficient because the engine doesn’t have a chance to reach its optimal operating temperature. Combining several errands into a single journey minimizes cold starts and improves overall fuel economy.

Consider using cruise control on long highway drives. Maintaining a consistent speed eliminates the fluctuations in throttle input that can waste fuel. This is especially effective on relatively flat stretches of road.

For more details, you can review all Lincoln fuel economy data.