| Engine | 3.7L 6-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (S6) |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Large Cars |
| Start-Stop | No |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 37177 |
20 MPG combined isn’t going to win any fuel economy awards, but it’s the reality for the 2016 Lincoln MKS with its 3.7L V6 and front-wheel drive. This figure, while not spectacular, reflects the MKS: a comfortably sized, traditionally styled sedan designed to deliver a smooth ride and a quiet cabin, rather than set any efficiency benchmarks. Buyers of this car prioritize space and quiet cruising over squeezing every last mile from a gallon of fuel.
City and highway performance
The EPA estimates the 2016 Lincoln MKS at 17 MPG in the city and 25 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the engine’s demands in stop-and-go traffic and the MKS’s not-insignificant curb weight. The highway number is more attainable during steady-state cruising. The six-speed automatic transmission, while smooth in operation, is geared for comfort and refinement rather than outright efficiency. These figures are realistic for drivers who split their time fairly evenly between city streets and highway commutes. Aggressive driving habits will, of course, drag those numbers down.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Lincoln MKS FWD 3.7L at $2,200. This calculation is based on driving 15,000 miles per year and using national average fuel prices. Keep in mind that fluctuations in gas prices can alter this figure either up or down significantly. This cost also assumes a typical mix of city and highway driving. Residents of areas with consistently higher gas prices may face a larger annual fuel bill.
Real-world expectations
While the EPA provides a baseline, real-world fuel economy often varies. Careful drivers who prioritize efficiency can likely meet or even slightly exceed the EPA’s highway rating. On the other hand, those who often use the MKS for short trips in densely populated areas, or accelerate aggressively, will likely fall short of the 17 MPG city estimate. Remember to check MKS MPG across all years to see owner reported figures.
How it compares
In 2016, the large sedan segment offered a mix of fuel economy performers. The Buick LaCrosse with its available 3.6L V6 and front-wheel drive hovered around the same 20 MPG combined figure, while offering similar interior space. The Toyota Avalon, known for its reliability and resale value, managed a slightly better 24 MPG combined with its 3.5L V6. Across the Lincoln lineup, you can check out all Lincoln fuel economy data. This comparison matters because buyers in this segment are weighing comfort, size, and features against operating costs. A few extra miles per gallon can add up over the life of the vehicle, especially if considering long-term ownership.
Tips to maximize efficiency
Maintain a steady speed and avoid aggressive acceleration. The 3.7L V6 in the MKS responds well to smooth throttle inputs; erratic acceleration burns unnecessary fuel. Anticipate traffic flow and coast whenever possible, minimizing the need for hard braking.
Ensure your tires are properly inflated to the recommended pressure listed on the doorjamb placard. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, reducing fuel economy. Check tire pressure regularly, especially during temperature changes.
Limit idling. Modern engines don’t require extended warm-up periods, especially in moderate climates. Excessive idling consumes fuel without the benefit of moving the vehicle. If you anticipate being stopped for more than a minute, turn off the engine.
Use cruise control on the highway. Maintaining a consistent speed helps optimize fuel efficiency. Cruise control can prevent unintentional speeding and improve overall MPG, particularly on long trips.
Keep the vehicle well-maintained. A well-tuned engine, clean air filter, and fresh spark plugs will all contribute to optimal fuel economy. Follow the recommended maintenance schedule in the owner’s manual to ensure your MKS is running at peak efficiency.