Lincoln · 2016
MKC FWD 2.0L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Front-Wheel Drive
City
20
MPG
Combined
23
MPG
Highway
29
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$1,900
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$250
saved per year
Class Comparison — Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Bottom 15%
Better than 15 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 23 MPG
This vehicle
23 MPG
Class average
37 MPG
Class lowest
18 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
5
Energy Score
Out of 10
5
GHG Score
Out of 10
387 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine2.0L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)
DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Engine DescSIDI
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID36505

23 MPG combined isn’t going to win any hypermiling awards, but it’s an acceptable result for the 2016 Lincoln MKC FWD with its 2.0L turbocharged engine. This isn’t a vehicle purchased by penny-pinchers looking to maximize every last drop of fuel. The MKC buyer prioritizes a comfortable ride, a well-appointed interior, and the elevated driving position of a small SUV. Fuel economy is a consideration, no doubt, but it’s typically lower on the list than style and features.

City and highway performance

The EPA figures for the MKC FWD (2.0L) break down to 20 MPG in the city and 29 MPG on the highway. The city figure reflects the engine’s need to work harder, particularly in stop-and-go traffic, where the turbocharger is constantly spooling and using extra fuel. The highway number is more respectable, indicating that the MKC can cruise efficiently once it gets up to speed. The six-speed automatic transmission plays a role here, offering reasonably well-spaced ratios that allow the engine to sit comfortably in its powerband, balancing performance and efficiency. Aggressive acceleration should be avoided, the turbo will happily deliver power, but at the expense of MPG.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates an annual fuel cost of $1,900 for the 2016 Lincoln MKC FWD (2.0L). This calculation assumes 15,000 miles driven per year and uses national average fuel prices. Keep in mind that this is simply an estimate. Your actual fuel costs will vary depending on your driving habits, the type of driving you do (city versus highway), and the prevailing fuel prices in your area. If you drive significantly more or less than 15,000 miles per year, or if gasoline prices spike, your annual fuel expense could be markedly different.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA provides a standardized testing framework, real-world fuel economy often differs. Many MKC owners report figures that are close to the EPA numbers, but some experience slightly lower MPG, particularly those who spend a significant amount of time driving in congested urban environments or have a lead foot. Using the vehicle’s available Eco mode can help, but even then, aggressive driving will negatively affect fuel consumption. Some owners report slightly better highway MPG than the EPA estimates, particularly on long road trips at consistent speeds.

How it compares

The MKC sits in a competitive segment. The Acura RDX (2WD) offered slightly better fuel economy, achieving 23 MPG city and 34 MPG highway. Buyers considering an RDX might prioritize a more practical, less overtly luxurious experience. The Lexus NX 200t (FWD) had an EPA rating of 22 MPG city and 29 MPG highway, placing it very close to the MKC’s numbers. Someone looking at the NX might desire a more distinctive and technologically advanced interior. The Audi Q3 (FWD) rated at 20 MPG city and 29 MPG highway shares the same highway rating as the MKC and a similar driving experience, while the BMW X1 (FWD) managed a slightly better 22 MPG city and 32 MPG highway. Prospective BMW owners were drawn to its sporty driving dynamics and brand cachet.

These MPG differences of 1-2 MPG in the city and 2-3 MPG on the highway, which may seem insignificant, can add up over the long term, particularly for drivers who rack up a lot of miles. Comparing MKC MPG across all years is also worthwhile. You can also check all all Lincoln fuel economy data to help gauge where the MKC falls comparing it to Lincoln’s overall brand fuel efficiency.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Avoid excessive idling. The MKC’s turbocharged engine consumes fuel even when stationary, so minimize idling time whenever possible. If you’re waiting for someone, turn off the engine. Even short periods of idling contribute to lower overall fuel economy, especially on a car with a small turbocharger.

Use cruise control on the highway. Maintaining a consistent speed on the highway is essential for maximizing fuel efficiency. Cruise control helps prevent unnecessary acceleration and deceleration, leading to more consistent fuel consumption. Use it carefully in hilly terrain, as the transmission may downshift frequently, negating some of the benefits.

Ensure proper tire inflation. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, forcing the engine to work harder and consume more fuel. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate them to the recommended levels, which can be found on the sticker inside the driver’s side doorjamb. Every little bit helps.

Anticipate traffic flow. Driving smoothly and anticipating traffic conditions can improve fuel economy. Avoid sudden acceleration and braking, and maintain a safe following distance to allow for gradual adjustments in speed. This driving style reduces the demands on the engine and transmission.

Use the Eco mode carefully. The MKC’s Eco mode adjusts the throttle response and transmission shift points to prioritize fuel efficiency. While using it all the time might reduce overall performance, engaging it during highway driving or in stop-and-go traffic can yield measurable improvements in MPG.