A combined 19 MPG is the price for driving a 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Sport with the supercharged 3.0L V6. Nobody buys this specific Range Rover Sport configuration for its fuel economy. They buy it for the brand, the presence, the luxurious interior, and the promised all-terrain capability. The fuel bill is a consequence, weighed against the attributes this SUV offers. They are trading fuel economy for status and capability.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates the 2016 Range Rover Sport 3.0L at 17 MPG in the city and 23 MPG on the highway. The difference between these numbers shows something about the vehicle’s engine and how it’s meant to be driven. The supercharged V6, while relatively efficient for its power output, performs worse in stop-and-go city driving, where its weight and the need to constantly accelerate take their toll. The highway figure, while not impressive, is respectable, suggesting that once up to speed, the engine can cruise efficiently. The eight-speed automatic transmission helps by keeping the engine in its optimal rev range.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Sport 3.0L is $3,050. This is calculated based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with 55% of those miles driven in the city and 45% on the highway. They also use the national average fuel price. This is a sobering number that should be considered before buying. It’s a significant annual expense, especially compared to more fuel-efficient SUVs.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA estimates provide a baseline, real-world fuel economy differs. The Range Rover Sport’s fuel economy depends on driving style, terrain, and load. Aggressive acceleration, frequent hard braking, and off-road use will lower your MPG. Consider that the supercharged engine responds well to premium fuel, and this is included in EPA’s calculations. Don’t expect to achieve the EPA numbers if you’re constantly using the vehicle’s power or live in an area with hills. Careful driving and highway miles might yield slightly better results, but don’t expect large improvements.

How it compares

Compared to other SUVs in its class, the 2016 Range Rover Sport 3.0L’s fuel economy is worse. For example, a 2016 BMW X5 sDrive35i (rear-wheel drive) achieves a combined 22 MPG, while the xDrive35i (AWD) gets 21 MPG. The Acura MDX manages 22 MPG combined. The Porsche Cayenne averages around 20 MPG in its base V6 configuration. This difference in fuel economy translates to savings over the vehicle’s lifespan. Buyers considering the Range Rover Sport pay a premium in purchase price and at the pump. If fuel efficiency is a concern, there are better choices. Research all Land fuel economy data. Also, check out ROVER MPG across all years.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Resist the urge to use the supercharged engine’s power. The Range Rover Sport is fun to drive quickly, but every acceleration run lowers fuel economy. Smooth acceleration will make a difference. Treat the throttle with respect if you want to save fuel.

Ensure your tires are properly inflated. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, which reduces fuel economy. Check your tire pressure regularly and inflate to the levels on the door jamb sticker. This improves your MPG.

Reduce weight. Carrying extra weight requires the engine to work harder, decreasing fuel efficiency. Remove items you don’t need from the cargo area. Every pound counts.

Avoid idling. Idling consumes fuel without covering any distance. If you’re going to be stopped for more than a minute, turn off the engine. This is important in city driving.

Plan your routes to minimize stop-and-go driving. Use navigation apps to find direct routes and avoid congestion. Anticipate traffic lights and adjust your speed to avoid unnecessary braking and acceleration.