| Engine | 3.0L 6-cyl |
| Transmission | Automatic (S8) |
| Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline |
| Vehicle Class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Engine Desc | SIDI |
| Start-Stop | Yes |
| EPA Vehicle ID | 36630 |
19 MPG combined is what you’ll get with a 2016 Land Rover Range Rover 3.0L 6-cyl. Nobody buys a Range Rover for its fuel efficiency. They buy it for its combination of presence, luxurious features, and go-anywhere capability. Fuel consumption is simply a budgeted factor, like premium scotch and Savile Row tailoring.
City and highway performance
The 2016 Range Rover 3.0L has different economy figures on the open road versus city streets. The EPA estimates 17 MPG in the city. This reflects stop-and-go driving that requires frequent acceleration, and the added fuel consumed by its weight. Highway driving reaches a more respectable 23 MPG. This difference highlights the importance of your driving patterns when evaluating the Range Rover’s fuel consumption. If your daily commute is primarily urban, you might see figures below the EPA estimate.
Annual fuel cost
The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Range Rover 3.0L is $3,050. This is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, using the EPA’s assumed national average fuel prices. This is just an estimate. Your fuel expenses will vary depending on your mileage, where you drive (fuel prices change), and how aggressively you drive. For budgeting, $3,050 annually is a benchmark to consider, though with today’s fuel prices, you may find you are spending more.
Real-world expectations
The EPA provides a standardized testing procedure to estimate MPG, but your experience with the 2016 Range Rover 3.0L will likely differ. Driving style, terrain, weather, and tire pressure can impact fuel consumption. Expect differences, especially if you regularly use the Range Rover’s off-road features or tow a trailer. Quick acceleration and high-speed driving will lower fuel economy, while steady driving and consistent speeds tend to improve it.
How it compares
Comparing the 2016 Range Rover 3.0L to competitors shows a mixed bag for fuel efficiency. The BMW X5 xDrive35i boasts a combined MPG of 20, slightly better than the Range Rover, while offering similar luxury and performance. The Porsche Cayenne with its base V6 engine achieves 21 MPG combined. The Mercedes-Benz GLE 400 4Matic offers a similar drivetrain layout to the BMW, and manages 20 MPG combined. These differences can add up over time. These vehicles have similar cargo capacity, passenger room, and off-road ability, so those focused on less gas might find the slightly better MPG appealing. Before buying a used Range Rover, see the ROVER MPG across all years.
Tips to maximize efficiency
The Range Rover isn’t known for fuel frugality, but you can take steps to improve its efficiency. One way to reduce fuel consumption is to maintain consistent speeds and avoid quick acceleration. The supercharged engine responds to throttle, but each surge of power uses fuel.
Ensure proper tire inflation. The correct tire pressure, listed on the doorjamb sticker, minimizes rolling resistance and improves fuel efficiency. Regularly checking and maintaining the recommended pressure is a simple way to save fuel. For a vehicle as heavy as a Range Rover, appropriate tire pressure makes a difference.
Reduce weight. Remove any non-essential items from the vehicle. Weight increases the energy required to accelerate and maintain speed, impacting fuel economy. This is a free way to improve performance and save gas. Land Rover has an extensive lineup, so seeing all Land fuel economy data might help you find something that suits your needs better.
Regular service is key. Follow the manufacturer’s maintenance schedule. Regular oil changes, air filter replacements, and tune-ups ensure the engine runs well. Neglecting maintenance can decrease performance and increase fuel consumption.
Use the Range Rover’s “Eco” mode, if equipped. This setting adjusts the throttle and transmission shift points to prioritize fuel efficiency. While it may reduce performance slightly, it can save fuel, especially during urban driving, where every bit impacts the 17 MPG rating.