Fiat · 2016
500 X 1.4L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Premium Gasoline
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Front-Wheel Drive
City
25
MPG
Combined
28
MPG
Highway
33
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$2,050
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$100
saved per year
Class Comparison — Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Top 39%
Better than 61 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 28 MPG
This vehicle
28 MPG
Class average
37 MPG
Class lowest
18 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
7
Energy Score
Out of 10
7
GHG Score
Out of 10
316 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine1.4L 4-cyl
TransmissionManual 6-spd
DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypePremium Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID36199

28 MPG combined in the 2016 Fiat 500X 1.4L is perfectly acceptable if you understand what this quirky Italian crossover is all about. This isn’t a Prius rival or a hyper-efficient commuter car. The 500X 1.4L, equipped with the manual transmission, appeals to a specific buyer: someone who prioritizes style, a fun-to-drive experience, and a unique European flair over squeezing every last mile out of a gallon of gas. It’s a city dweller who occasionally ventures out, valuing maneuverability and personality just as much as fuel efficiency.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates of 25 MPG in the city and 33 MPG on the highway accurately reflect the 500X 1.4L’s strengths and weaknesses. The relatively low city MPG comes from the engine’s smaller displacement and the need to rev it out a bit to get it moving in stop-and-go traffic. The eager nature of this little turbo responds best when you’re willing to give it some throttle. The highway number, however, is more impressive, showing that the well-spaced six-speed manual allows the engine to cruise comfortably and efficiently at higher speeds. While 33 MPG is reasonable, remember that aggressive acceleration for passing or uphill climbs will quickly erode that figure, requiring a downshift or two to maintain momentum.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates that the annual fuel cost for the 2016 Fiat 500X 1.4L is $2,050. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, using national average fuel prices at the time of calculation. Naturally, if you drive significantly more or less than 15,000 miles annually, or if fuel prices rise or fall, your actual fuel cost will vary. However, the $2,050 figure provides a standardized benchmark for comparing the 500X’s running costs with other vehicles. Keep in mind that premium fuel is not required, allowing you to use regular unleaded, which helps in keeping expenses down a bit. You can find all Fiat fuel economy data on our site.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA estimates provide a useful baseline, real-world fuel economy often differs. The biggest factors impacting your MPG will be driving style and the type of roads you frequent. If you spend most of your time battling rush-hour traffic or enjoy spirited driving, expect to see numbers closer to the low end of the EPA range, perhaps even dipping below 25 MPG.

Conversely, if you primarily drive on the open road in a relaxed manner, exceeding the 33 MPG highway estimate is certainly possible. Tire pressure maintenance also plays a critical role; ensure your tires are properly inflated to the recommended PSI to minimize rolling resistance and maximize fuel efficiency.

Also be sure to account for the effect of roof racks and cargo carriers, which increase drag and can significantly impact fuel economy.

How it compares

Compared to other subcompact crossovers, the 2016 Fiat 500X 1.4L’s fuel economy is competitive but hardly class-leading. A similarly equipped Honda HR-V, for instance, achieves around 31 MPG combined. However, the HR-V leans more towards practicality and overall efficiency, lacking the Fiat’s distinctive Italian styling and engaging driving dynamics. The Mazda CX-3, known for its sporty handling, manages around 29 MPG combined, a marginal improvement over the 500X in the real world. The Jeep Renegade, built on the same platform as the 500X, generally returns slightly lower MPG figures, often around 26-27 MPG combined, owing to its blockier design and focus on off-road capability.

The person choosing the 500X is explicitly not prioritizing ultimate fuel efficiency above all else; they are willing to accept slightly lower numbers for the character and unique experience this crossover provides. You can also compare the 500 MPG across all years.

Tips to maximize efficiency

The 1.4L turbo engine in the 500X rewards smooth and deliberate throttle inputs. Avoid abrupt acceleration and hard braking, as these habits dramatically reduce fuel economy. Instead, anticipate traffic flow, maintain a steady speed, and accelerate gradually to optimize fuel consumption.

Given that this engine responds well to being revved, use the manual transmission to your advantage. Shift gears at appropriate points to keep the engine in its most efficient operating range. Practice smooth and efficient shifting to avoid wasting fuel. Keeping the RPMs in the sweet spot for torque delivery (around 2500-3500 RPM) will help you maintain momentum without excessively straining the engine.

Keep the 500X’s weight down to a minimum. Remove any unnecessary cargo from the vehicle, as added weight increases fuel consumption. A lighter car requires less energy to accelerate and maintain speed, directly translating to improved MPG.

Regular maintenance is essential for optimal fuel economy. Ensure the engine is properly tuned, the air filter is clean, and the tires are correctly inflated. A well-maintained engine runs more efficiently, and properly inflated tires reduce rolling resistance, both contributing to better MPG.

Plan your trips strategically. Combine errands into a single trip to minimise cold starts, which are particularly fuel-inefficient. Also, consider using navigation apps to find the most direct and fuel-efficient routes, avoiding congested areas and unnecessary detours. Remember to limit idling time, as idling burns fuel without covering any distance.