Mazda · 2015
CX-5 4WD 2.0L 4-cyl
✓ EPA Verified
Regular Gasoline
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
4-Wheel Drive
City
25
MPG
Combined
27
MPG
Highway
30
MPG
Annual Fuel Cost
$1,600
Based on 15,000 miles/year · EPA estimates
vs avg gas vehicle
$550
saved per year
Class Comparison — Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Top 30%
Better than 70 out of 100 vehicles in its class for fuel efficiency.
This vehicle: 27 MPG
This vehicle
27 MPG
Class average
31 MPG
Class lowest
14 MPG
EPA Energy & Environment Scores
7
Energy Score
Out of 10
7
GHG Score
Out of 10
324 lbs
Annual CO₂
g/mile tailpipe CO₂
No
Start-Stop
Not equipped
Vehicle Specifications
Engine2.0L 4-cyl
TransmissionAutomatic (S6)
Drive4-Wheel Drive
Fuel TypeRegular Gasoline
Vehicle ClassSmall Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD
Engine DescSIDI
Start-StopNo
EPA Vehicle ID34657

27 MPG combined is a good number for the 2015 Mazda CX-5 4WD 2.0L. It’s a practical balance that provides reasonable efficiency for most owners, combined with the advantages of a larger vehicle with all-wheel drive. CX-5 buyers aren’t prioritizing ultimate fuel savings, but they expect reasonable mileage. This figure provides that.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates 25 MPG in the city and 30 MPG on the highway for this CX-5. In urban environments, the 2.0L engine can feel a bit taxed, especially when loaded with passengers or cargo. Stop-and-go traffic emphasizes this, pulling down the MPG closer to the lower end of the estimate, but smart driving habits can help achieve the 25 MPG EPA projection.

On the open road, things improve. The CX-5 settles into a comfortable cruise. With the automatic transmission doing its job, the engine isn’t strained. 30 MPG is attainable on longer highway drives, and perhaps even a bit better if you avoid aggressive acceleration and maintain a consistent speed.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA calculates the annual fuel cost for this 2015 Mazda CX-5 4WD 2.0L at $1,600. This figure is derived from driving 15,000 miles per year, using national average fuel prices at the time. Fluctuations in gas prices will impact your actual spending. The EPA’s estimate provides a baseline for comparison against other vehicles, allowing prospective buyers to understand the relative cost of ownership.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA figures are a benchmark, real-world MPG varies. Several factors impact the fuel economy you’ll experience. Driving style is primary, because aggressive acceleration and frequent hard braking drop any driver’s MPG. Terrain makes a difference; hilly areas put more stress on the engine. Finally, weather conditions can subtract from your MPG, as cold temperatures reduce engine efficiency and increased use of climate control saps power.

Owners report that consistently matching the EPA’s 27 MPG combined isn’t difficult with mindful driving. Some drivers find they can exceed the 30 MPG highway rating on longer trips, especially if they keep their speeds near the speed limit. For a better impression of what the average driver is achieving, consult owner forums and MPG tracking websites.

How it compares

The 2015 Honda CR-V, a key competitor, delivered similar fuel economy numbers in its AWD configuration. The CR-V boasted slightly better city mileage (27 MPG vs 25 MPG), but it hit the same 30 MPG on the highway. The Toyota RAV4 also hovered around the same combined figure as the CX-5. The Mazda differentiates itself in driving dynamics, because its superior handling means that it can still deliver equivalent or slightly better MPG than its closest competitors despite offering a more engaging experience.

By comparison, the Subaru Forester with its standard all-wheel drive system was somewhat better. The 2015 Forester 2.5i delivered 25 MPG in the city and 32 MPG on the highway. Although it beats the CX-5, the Forester delivers a different driving experience with a less refined interior. Therefore, the CX-5 isn’t always the top choice based on MPG alone, but it’s often the best choice when considering the complete package.

Those considering a smaller, more fuel-efficient option, like a Mazda3 hatchback, would see significant gains in fuel economy, but that comes at the expense of cargo space and ground clearance. For those who don’t need AWD or the extra space, all Mazda fuel economy data show that a smaller hatchback from Mazda will probably be best.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Gentle starts and smooth acceleration make a noticeable difference with the CX-5’s 2.0L engine. Avoid burying the accelerator when starting from a stop or when merging onto the highway because the engine needs a good amount of revs to produce reasonable power. Gradual acceleration saves fuel and contributes to a more relaxed, safer driving experience.

Tire pressure is often overlooked, but properly inflated tires reduce rolling resistance and improve fuel economy. Check your tires regularly and inflate them to the recommended pressure listed on the driver’s side door jamb. This attention to detail can yield small but consistent gains.

Minimize unnecessary weight inside the vehicle. Extra cargo forces the engine to work harder, burning more fuel. Periodically clean out items you don’t actually need, this is important for CX-5 drivers with heavy loads.

Plan your routes strategically. Avoiding rush hour traffic and construction zones can save considerable fuel. Constant stop-and-go driving is detrimental to fuel economy. The 2015 CX-5 automatic transmission will not achieve its maximum efficiency in these conditions.

Consider that while all-wheel drive provides extra grip in challenging conditions, it also adds weight and drivetrain friction. Disengaging AWD when it’s not needed is not an option, due to the system’s automatic nature. The all-wheel drive system will not lower fuel economy numbers as drastically as with other manufacturers, because of its already excellent fuel economy. CX 5 MPG across all years provides a more detailed picture.