19 MPG combined isn’t going to win any hypermiling awards, but let’s be realistic: the 2019 Volkswagen Atlas 3.6L isn’t targeting Prius shoppers. This is a big, comfortable, three-row SUV designed for families who need space and appreciate a smooth, reliable V6 engine. Fuel economy is a consideration, sure, but it’s balanced against practicality and capability. Buyers in this segment understand the trade-offs, and the Atlas makes its case by excelling in other crucial areas.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates for the 2019 Volkswagen Atlas 3.6L peg city driving at 17 MPG and highway cruising at 24 MPG. These numbers reflect the reality of moving a vehicle of this size and weight, especially in stop-and-go urban conditions. The eight-speed automatic transmission does its best to keep the engine in its most efficient range, but physics inevitably plays a role. On the open road, the Atlas settles into a comfortable lope, making long trips relatively painless, both for passengers and, to some extent, your wallet. That 24 MPG highway figure is achievable if you resist the temptation to constantly exercise the V6’s passing power. The 3.6L engine provides adequate power, but it’s not the most efficient choice in the segment. It works hard when the vehicle is loaded with people or cargo.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates the annual fuel cost for the 2019 Volkswagen Atlas 3.6L at $2,300. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, with a mix of city and highway driving, and using national average fuel prices. It’s a useful benchmark for comparing the Atlas to other vehicles, but remember that your actual fuel costs will vary depending on your driving habits, local fuel prices, and the ratio of city to highway miles you typically drive. Keeping accurate records of your fill-ups can provide a more personalized and precise picture of your true fuel expenses.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA numbers provide a standardized comparison point, real-world fuel economy for the 2019 Volkswagen Atlas 3.6L can vary. Drivers who primarily commute in congested city traffic may see figures closer to the 17 MPG city estimate, or even a bit lower. Conversely, those who frequently take long highway trips with minimal stops might achieve slightly better than the 24 MPG highway rating. Factors like driving style, tire pressure, and even the use of accessories such as roof racks can also impact fuel consumption.

How it compares

The 2019 Volkswagen Atlas 3.6L’s fuel economy sits squarely in the middle of the three-row SUV pack. For example, the Honda Pilot Touring with its 3.5L V6 manages approximately 22 MPG combined, while the Toyota Highlander with the 3.5L V6 achieves a similar 22 MPG combined. The Ford Explorer, depending on the engine configuration, could range anywhere from 18 MPG to 24 MPG combined. However, those numbers can depend on whether the Explorer runs the smaller turbocharged engine or the higher displacement V6. Choosing the Kia Telluride or Hyundai Palisade could result in about 21 MPG combined. While a few competitors offer slightly better fuel economy, the Atlas counters with its spacious interior and comfortable ride, which are often higher priorities for families in this segment. It’s important to consider ATLAS MPG across all years when comparison shopping. Buyers should carefully weigh these considerations. You can also find all Volkswagen fuel economy data on this site.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Gentle acceleration and braking have a significant impact on fuel consumption. Avoid aggressive starts and stops, as these actions force the engine to work harder and burn more fuel. Anticipate traffic flow and maintain a steady speed whenever possible to minimize unnecessary acceleration and deceleration.

Proper tire inflation is critical for optimal fuel efficiency. Check your tire pressure regularly and ensure that your tires are inflated to the recommended pressure, which can be found on a sticker inside the driver’s side doorjamb or in the owner’s manual. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, leading to decreased fuel economy. Aim for the pressure recommended for efficiency, even if it’s higher than the “comfort” pressure listed.

Reduce unnecessary weight in the vehicle. Carrying extra cargo adds to the overall weight of the vehicle, which in turn reduces fuel efficiency. Remove any items from the trunk or cargo area that are not needed, such as sports equipment, tools, or other miscellaneous items. Empty the roof rack when it is not in use, as roof racks create drag even when empty. The lighter the vehicle is, the lower the fuel consumption will be.

Consider using cruise control on highway drives. Cruise control helps maintain a constant speed, which can improve fuel efficiency. However, avoid using cruise control in hilly terrain, as the system may downshift frequently, negating any potential fuel savings. Also, consider driving at slightly lower speeds when safe and practical, particularly on long highway trips. Even reducing speed by 5-10 mph can noticeably improve economy.