15 MPG combined. That’s poor fuel economy. But understanding that figure in the context of the 2019 Land Rover Range Rover LWB SVA 5.0L 8-cyl is important. This isn’t a vehicle purchased for maximizing fuel savings. It’s bought for its combination of luxury, presence, and all-terrain capability. Its owners prioritize a commanding driving position, a whisper-quiet cabin swathed in leather, and the ability to traverse a muddy field as easily as a city street. The supercharged V8 is part of the experience; it’s linked to the SVA’s persona. Those who prioritize fuel efficiency will be shopping in an entirely different segment.

City and highway performance

The EPA estimates of 13 MPG in the city and 19 MPG on the highway show a trade-off. Stop-and-go urban driving affects the Range Rover SVA’s weight and the inefficiency of a large displacement, supercharged engine. The highway figure, while still relatively low, shows some improvement. This reflects a larger percentage of time spent at steady speeds, where the eight-speed automatic transmission can select higher gears and reduce engine strain. But even on the open road, aerodynamics are not a strong suit for this vehicle.

Annual fuel cost

The EPA estimates that the annual fuel cost for the 2019 Land Rover Range Rover LWB SVA 5.0L 8-cyl is $3,850. This figure is based on driving 15,000 miles per year, using a combination of city and highway driving, and on the national average fuel prices at the time of the EPA’s testing. For owners covering significantly more than 15,000 miles or consistently paying higher prices at the pump, the actual figure could easily exceed this estimate. It’s a reminder that the privilege of owning and operating such a vehicle carries a financial burden beyond the initial purchase price. For all Land all Land fuel economy data, this SVA rates near the bottom.

Real-world expectations

While the EPA figures provide a benchmark, real-world fuel economy often differs. Aggressive driving, frequent short trips, and the use of premium fuel (which is recommended) will all negatively impact the numbers. Towing, even within the vehicle’s capabilities, has an effect. Conversely, careful and deliberate driving, combined with longer trips at consistent speeds, may allow drivers to approach or even slightly exceed the EPA highway estimate. Expect to see figures broadly in line with the official ratings, acknowledging that driving style and conditions play a role.

How it compares

Compared to other high-performance SUVs, the Range Rover SVA’s fuel economy is poor. The Mercedes-AMG G63, another V8-powered vehicle with iconic status, achieves a slightly better 16 MPG combined. A Porsche Cayenne Turbo, while offering comparable performance, edges ahead with around 17 MPG combined. Even within the Land Rover range, other models present more efficient options. The Range Rover P400e plug-in hybrid, for example, offers significantly improved fuel economy in city driving due to its electric range. But for the buyer seeking the supercharged SVA, these comparisons are irrelevant. They are drawn to the power, prestige, and off-road ability that this configuration provides. See ROVER MPG across all years for more model year data.

Tips to maximize efficiency

Despite the vehicle’s nature, some strategies can help improve fuel consumption. Avoid accelerating and braking hard. The supercharged engine responds instantly to throttle input, but using this power drains fuel rapidly. Gentle and gradual acceleration minimizes wasted energy, especially from a standstill.

Regularly check tire pressures. Underinflated tires increase rolling resistance, forcing the engine to work harder and consuming more fuel. Maintaining the recommended tire pressures ensures efficiency and prolongs tire life.

Minimize idling. Letting the engine idle wastes fuel. In situations where you anticipate stopping for more than a minute, it’s better to turn off the engine. Modern engine start-stop systems are helpful, though this SVA does not have that tech.

Plan your routes strategically. Avoid congested areas and peak traffic times whenever possible. Opting for routes with fewer stops and starts can improve fuel economy, especially in urban environments.